Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25436208›Full record

ArticleHeart, lung and vessels2014

Mobile ECMO team for inter-hospital transportation of patients with ARDS: a retrospective case series.

A Lucchini, C De Felippis, S Elli, R Gariboldi, S Vimercati, P Tundo, H Bondi, M C Costa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart, lung and vessels, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Interhospital transport of ARDS patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2019
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

A LucchiniIntensive Care and Emergency Department, General Intensive Care Unit, University of Milan-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
C De FelippisAdult Intensive Care Unit, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospital of Leicester-NHS Trust, UK.
S ElliIntensive Care and Emergency Department, General Intensive Care Unit, University of Milan-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
R GariboldiIntensive Care and Emergency Department, General Intensive Care Unit, University of Milan-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
S VimercatiIntensive Care and Emergency Department, General Intensive Care Unit, University of Milan-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
P TundoIntensive Care and Emergency Department, General Intensive Care Unit, University of Milan-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
H BondiIntensive Care and Emergency Department, General Intensive Care Unit, University of Milan-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
M C CostaPerfusion Service, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTransport of patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is currently available in 5 referral centers in our country.

methodsRetrospective case series of patients managed by our mobile extracorporeal membrane oxygenation team and transferred to San Gerardo University Hospital from December 2004 to December 2012.

results42 patients were transported. The mean age was 42.11 (standard deviation ±18.11) years, with a range between 2 years and 70. 14 patients were females (33%) and 28 males (67%). The average transport distance was 121.69 km (±183.08) with a range between 9 km and 1044 Km. The mission's mean time was equal to 508 minutes (±185) with range of 120-960 minutes. 29 patients (69%) were transported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, while 13 patients (31%) were transported with conventional ventilation. In 28 patients (97%) a veno-venous bypass was utilized, while in one case (3%) a Veno-Arterial cannulation was performed. 32 patients survived (76%) and have been discharged alive from hospital. No major clinical or technical issues were observed during the transport.

conclusionsAccording to our data, we conclude that a dedicated mobile team allowed safe ground transportation of patients with severe acute lung injury to our tertiary care institution.

Indexed as

ECMOextracorporeal membrane oxygenationmobile emergency unitsevere acute respiratory syndrometransportation of patients

Identifiers

PMID25436208
PMCPMC4246845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.