Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25436015›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2015

DCF intraperitoneal and intravenous dual chemotherapy regimen for advanced gastric cancer: A feasibility study.

Zeng-Li Feng, Liu-Bin Chen, Zhen-Yu Liu, Xue-Ji Chen, Xiao-Can Ren, Yue-E Liu, Yu Peng, Hai-Gang Wang, Shun-Mao Ma, Feng-Jie Meng and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Conversion Surgery Post-Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel and Systemic Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer Carcinomatosis Peritonei. Are We Ready?Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2017
    Article
  5. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2017
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zeng-Li FengDepartment of General Surgery, North China Petroleum Bureau General Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Renqiu, Hebei 062552, P.R. China.
Liu-Bin ChenDepartment of Ultrasound Radiology, North China Petroleum Bureau Youjian Hospital, Renqiu, Hebei 062552, P.R. China.
Zhen-Yu LiuDepartment of Surgery, North China Petroleum Bureau Caiyi Hospital, Renqiu, Hebei 062552, P.R. China.
Xue-Ji ChenDepartment of Oncology, North China Petroleum Bureau General Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Renqiu, Hebei 062552, P.R. China.
Xiao-Can RenDepartment of Oncology, North China Petroleum Bureau General Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Renqiu, Hebei 062552, P.R. China.
Yue-E LiuDepartment of Oncology, North China Petroleum Bureau General Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Renqiu, Hebei 062552, P.R. China.
Yu PengDepartment of Oncology, North China Petroleum Bureau General Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Renqiu, Hebei 062552, P.R. China.
Hai-Gang WangDepartment of General Surgery, North China Petroleum Bureau General Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Renqiu, Hebei 062552, P.R. China.
Shun-Mao MaDepartment of General Surgery, North China Petroleum Bureau General Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Renqiu, Hebei 062552, P.R. China.
Feng-Jie MengDepartment of General Surgery, North China Petroleum Bureau General Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Renqiu, Hebei 062552, P.R. China.
Qiang LinDepartment of Oncology, North China Petroleum Bureau General Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Renqiu, Hebei 062552, P.R. China.
Hebei Medical University · CNHebei General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer is the fourth most common type of cancer globally and accounts for the second highest cancer-associated mortality rate in the world. Current treatment strategies for gastric cancer include surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy may increase the IP concentrations of chemotherapy drugs and reduce the systemic toxicity. At present, IP chemotherapy is used to treat patients with advanced gastric cancer, which has a high rate of peritoneal recurrence. The present study evaluated the feasibility of using docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (DCF) in an IP and intravenous (IV) dual chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. The treatment-associated adverse reactions and preliminary efficacy were reported. The first dose level utilized the full dose of DCF: Docetaxel, day one, 45 mg/m2 (IP) and day eight, 30 mg/m2 (IV); cisplatin (DDP), day one, 75 mg/m2 (IP); and fluorouracil (FU), days one to five, 750 mg/m2 (continuous IV). A total of six patients were treated at this level and two patients withdrew due to serious adverse reactions. Taking into account that the the tolerated doses used in combination regimens for Eastern populations are lower than that of the corresponding doses for Western populations, the dosages of the three drugs were all reduced by 20% in the application of the second dose level: Docetaxel, day one, 30 mg/m2 (IP) and day eight, 30 mg/m2 (IV); DDP, day two, 60 mg/m2 (IP); and FU, days one to five, 600 mg/m2 (continuous IV). A total of 26 patients were treated at this level. The main adverse reaction was bone marrow suppression, with grade III/IV neutropenia, leukopenia and febrile neutropenia accounting for 61.5, 53.8 and 19.2% of reactions, respectively, and grade III/IV anemia and thrombocytopenia accounting for 19.2 and 15.4% of reactions, respectively. Gastrointestinal adverse reactions primarily consisted of abdominal pain, with grade III/IV abdominal pain accounting for 30.8% of reactions. Only 7.7% of the patients withdrew from the treatment. The median time to progression (TTP) was five months [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.0-9.0 months], and the median overall survival (OS) was nine months (95% CI, 7.4-10.6 months). It was concluded that the DCF regimen with reduced dosage should be applied. IP and IV dual chemotherapy for the treatment of unresectable advanced gastric cancer is tolerated and demonstrated a good initial efficacy. Strategies for mitigating and reducing the adverse gastrointestinal reactions, particularly abdominal pain, may be the focus of future studies.

Indexed as

cisplatindocetaxeldual chemotherapyfluorouracilgastric cancerintraperitoneal chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID25436015
PMCPMC4246631
OpenAlexW1972327746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.