ReviewEpigenetics & chromatin2014
Two ways to fold the genome during the cell cycle: insights obtained with chromosome conformation capture.
Review in Epigenetics & chromatin, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed.
- Postmitotic transcription and 3D regulation show locus-specific and differentiation-specific sensitivity to cohesin depletion.Nature genetics · 2026Article
- Interphase chromosome conformation is specified by distinct folding programmes inherited through mitotic chromosomes or the cytoplasm.Nature cell biology · 2026Article
- Coarse-grained chromatin dynamics by tracking multiple similarly labeled gene loci.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- Cohesin distribution alone predicts chromatin organization in yeast via conserved-current loop extrusion.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Review
- Unraveling the three-dimensional (3D) genome architecture in Neurodevelopmental Disorders (NDDs).Neurogenetics · 2024Review
- Interphase chromosome conformation is specified by distinct folding programs inherited via mitotic chromosomes or through the cytoplasm.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Loops and the activity of loop extrusion factors constrain chromatin dynamics.Molecular biology of the cell · 2023Article
- Primordial super-enhancers: heat shock-induced chromatin organization in yeast.Trends in cell biology · 2021Review
- Mitotic chromosomes.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2021Review
- Extrusion of chromatin loops by a composite loop extrusion factor.Physical review. E · 2021Article
- Topologically associating domain boundaries that are stable across diverse cell types are evolutionarily constrained and enriched for heritability.American journal of human genetics · 2021Article
- Dynamic 3D Chromatin Reorganization during Establishment and Maintenance of Pluripotency.Stem cell reports · 2020Review
- Retinoic Acid Promotes Endothelial Cell Cycle Early G1 State to Enable Human Hemogenic Endothelial Cell Specification.Cell reports · 2020Article
- Conformational state switching and pathways of chromosome dynamics in cell cycle.Applied physics reviews · 2020Article
- Chromatin architecture reorganization in murine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Chromosome conformation capture that detects novel cis- and trans-interactions in budding yeast.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2020Article
- Aneuploidy and gene expression: is there dosage compensation?Epigenomics · 2019Review
- BRCA1-associated R-loop affects transcription and differentiation in breast luminal epithelial cells.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- Dense neural networks for predicting chromatin conformation.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic and epigenetic inheritance through mitosis is critical for dividing cells to maintain their state. This process occurs in the context of large-scale re-organization of chromosome conformation during prophase leading to the formation of mitotic chromosomes, and during the reformation of the interphase nucleus during telophase and early G1. This review highlights how recent studies over the last 5 years employing chromosome conformation capture combined with classical models of chromosome organization based on decades of microscopic observations, are providing new insights into the three-dimensional organization of chromatin inside the interphase nucleus and within mitotic chromosomes. One striking observation is that interphase genome organization displays cell type-specific features that are related to cell type-specific gene expression, whereas mitotic chromosome folding appears universal and tissue invariant. This raises the question of whether or not there is a need for an epigenetic memory for genome folding. Herein, the two different folding states of mammalian genomes are reviewed and then models are discussed wherein instructions for cell type-specific genome folding are locally encoded in the linear genome and transmitted through mitosis, e.g., as open chromatin sites with or without continuous binding of transcription factors. In the next cell cycle these instructions are used to re-assemble protein complexes on regulatory elements which then drive three-dimensional folding of the genome from the bottom up through local action and self-assembly into higher order levels of cell type-specific organization. In this model, no explicit epigenetic memory for cell type-specific chromosome folding is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.