Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25435907›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2014

Dramatic response to dabrafenib and trametinib combination in a BRAF V600E-mutated cholangiocarcinoma: implementation of a molecular tumour board and next-generation sequencing for personalized medicine.

Arturo Loaiza-Bonilla, Erica Clayton, Emma Furth, Mark O'Hara, Jennifer Morrissette

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Third-line sunitinib treatment in aCancer biology & therapy · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Impressive response to dualJournal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2016
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arturo Loaiza-BonillaAbramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Erica ClaytonAbramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Emma FurthAbramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Mark O'HaraAbramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Jennifer MorrissetteAbramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is the case of a 47-year-old woman diagnosed with chemotherapy and radiation-refractory BRAF V600E mutant, poorly differentiated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), with multiple metastatic lesions within the liver, lungs, pleura, and bone, stage IV. Discussion of her malignancy's next-generation sequencing genomic information at a multidisciplinary molecular tumour board took place. The patient was considered a suitable candidate for dual BRAF and MEK inhibition, with the intent to prolong her survival and optimize the quality of life. We report her excellent tolerance and exceptional response to dual therapy with dabrafenib and trametinib, including symptomatic and sustained near-complete radiological improvement. We also briefly review the current knowledge of the genomics of cholangiocarcinoma with a focus on BRAF mutations, and make a point of the importance of the establishment of a molecular tumour board for personalized genomic medicine approaches. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of the use of personalized genomic information for the successful management of a patient with ICC, and it is also the first description of dual BRAF and MEK targeted therapy in this malignancy, leading to what is considered an exceptional response.

Indexed as

BRAFcholangiocarcinomadabrafenibexceptional respondergenomic medicineMEKmolecular tumour boardnext-generation sequencingpersonalized medicinetrametinib

Identifiers

PMID25435907
PMCPMC4239128
OpenAlexW2010110453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.