Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25435846›Full record

ArticleRadiology and oncology2014

Searching for primaries in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of unknown primary and clinically suspected NET: Evaluation of Ga-68 DOTATOC PET/CT and In-111 DTPA octreotide SPECT/CT.

Nils Friedemann Schreiter, Ann-Mirja Bartels, Vera Froeling, Ingo Steffen, Ulrich-Frank Pape, Alexander Beck, Bernd Hamm, Winfried Brenner, Rainer Röttgen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology and oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Localization of Unknown Primary Site withJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2017
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Growth hormone-releasing hormone, growth hormone, and neuroendocrine tumors.Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Dual PET Imaging with [Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Nuclear Imaging of Neuroendocrine Tumors.Surgical oncology clinics of North America · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Current best practice in the management of neuroendocrine tumors.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nils Friedemann SchreiterDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Ann-Mirja BartelsDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Vera FroelingDepartment of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Ingo SteffenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Ulrich-Frank PapeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Alexander BeckDepartment of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Bernd HammDepartment of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Winfried BrennerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Rainer RöttgenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany ; Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of In-111 DTPA octreotide SPECT/CT and Ga-68 DOTATOC PET/CT for detection of primary tumors in patients with either neuroendocrine tumor of unknown primary (NETUP) or clinically suspected primary NET (SNET). PATIENTS AND

methodsA total of 123 patients were included from 2006 to 2009, 52 received Ga-68 DOTATOC PET/CT (NETUP, 33; SNET, 19) and 71 underwent In-111 DTPA octreotide SPECT/CT (50; 21). The standard of reference included histopathology or clinical verification based on follow-up examinations.

resultsIn the NETUP group Ga-68 DOTATOC detected primaries in 15 patients (45.5%) and In-111 DTPA octreotide in 4 patients (8%) (p < 0.001); in the SNET group, only 2 primaries could be detected, all by Ga-68 DOTATOC. In patients with NETUP, primary tumors could be found significantly more often than in patients with SNET (p = 0.01). Out of these 21 patients 14 patients were operated.

conclusionGa-68 DOTATOC PET/CT is preferable to In-111 DTPA octreotide SPECT/CT when searching for primary NETs in patients with NETUP but should be used with caution in patients with SNET.

Indexed as

clinically suspected NETCUPGa-68 DOTATOC PET/CTIn-111 DTPA octreotide SPECTNET

Identifiers

PMID25435846
PMCPMC4230553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.