Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25435818›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary ecology research2012

Distributions of reproductive and somatic cell numbers in diverse

Deborah E Shelton, Alexey G Desnitskiy, Richard E Michod

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary ecology research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evolution of reproductive strategies in incipient multicellularity.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Deborah E SheltonDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Alexey G DesnitskiyDepartment of Embryology, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Richard E MichodDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
University of Arizona · USSt Petersburg University · RU

Funding

Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Biomedical SystemsT32GM084905 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI SECOMB, TIMOTHY W. · 2009 to 2018
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM084905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQUESTIONS: For DATA DESCRIPTION: For each of five SEARCH

methodWe compare the distribution of reproductive cell numbers to a Poisson distribution. We also compare the overall dispersion of reproductive cell number among species by calculating the coefficient of variation (CV). We compare the bivariate (reproductive and somatic cell) dataset to simulated datasets produced from a simple model of cell-type specification with intrinsic variability and colony size variation. This allows us to roughly estimate the level of intrinsic variability that is most consistent with our observed bivariate data (given an unknown level of size variation).

conclusionsThe overall variability (CV) in reproductive cell number is high in

Indexed as

cellular differentiationdevelopmenteco-devoevolutionmulticellularityreproductive allocationrobustnessVolvox

Identifiers

PMID25435818
PMCPMC4244606
OpenAlexW1550084624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.