Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25435737›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2014

An audit of fresh frozen plasma usage in a tertiary trauma care centre in north India.

Neha Agarwal, Arulselvi Subramanian, Ravindra Mohan Pandey, Venencia Albert, Sulekha Karjee, Vedanand Arya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Neha AgarwalDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma centre, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Arulselvi SubramanianDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma centre, AIIMS, New Delhi, India ; Department of Blood Bank, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma centre, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Ravindra Mohan PandeyDepartment of Biostatistics, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Venencia AlbertDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma centre, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Sulekha KarjeeDepartment of Blood Bank, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma centre, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Vedanand AryaDepartment of Blood Bank, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma centre, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion is a crucial part of management of trauma patients. There is a paucity of literature about the audit of appropriateness of FFP use in trauma patients. To evaluate and analyze the appropriateness of FFP transfusion practices for trauma patients. Prospectively compiled blood bank records of FFP transfusion practices over a period of 4 months from Augusts'08 through Deember'08 were retrospectively analyzed for 207 patients. The number of FFP units used in all these trauma patients were evaluated a propos the cause of injury, departments, type of surgery, presence of coagulopathy, bleeding, massive transfusion, length of hospital stay and patient outcome. Trauma scores such as Glasgow coma score and injury severity score were also calculated to estimate the severity of injury. The appropriateness of FFP transfusion was assessed according to the guidelines drafted by the College of American Pathologists. FFP transfusion for patients experiencing active bleeding, micro vascular bleeding, coagulopathy and/or massive transfusion, was deemed appropriate. Patients receiving FFP were categorized and individually correlated with the outcome. The influences of other variables which affect patient outcome were excluded using stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis. p value < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. A total of 207 trauma patients were included in the study, 183 (88.4 %) males and 24 (11.6 %) females. The FFP use among neurosurgery patients was 46.9 %, general surgery patients 40.6 % and orthopedics 12.6 %. Appropriate use of FFP was 49.5 % according to the CAP guidelines. Trauma patients who required FFP as a part of treatment were categorized as; Patients who had bleeding alone (n = 40), bleeding with coagulopathy (n = 16), and coagulopathy alone (n = 43), and further correlated with the outcome and were found statistically insignificant. The prevalence of appropriate use of FFP at trauma centre was 49.5 %. The FFP use by neurosurgery:orthopedics:general surgery was 5:1:4. The highest appropriate FFP use was by Neurosurgery department (50.5 %). Assessing the pattern of usage and rate of misuse of FFP units, allows us to establish required strategies to improve the state of affairs.

Indexed as

AppropriatenessCoagulopathyFFPGuidelines

Identifiers

PMID25435737
PMCPMC4243410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.