Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25435667›Full record

ArticleBiology of sport2014

THE GSTP1 c.313A>G POLYMORPHISM MODULATES THE CARDIORESPIRATORY RESPONSE TO AEROBIC TRAINING.

A Zarebska, Z Jastrzebski, M Kaczmarczyk, K Ficek, A Maciejewska-Karlowska, M Sawczuk, A Leońska-Duniec, P Krol, P Cieszczyk, P Zmijewski and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of sport, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Genes to predict VOBMC genomics · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Mitochondrial mutations alter endurance exercise response and determinants in mice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. TheJournal of sports science & medicine · 2016
    Article
  9. Does theJournal of human kinetics · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

A ZarebskaAcademy of Physical Education and Sport, Department of Tourism and Recreation, Gdansk, Poland.
Z JastrzebskiAcademy of Physical Education and Sport, Department of Tourism and Recreation, Gdansk, Poland.
M KaczmarczykAcademy of Physical Education and Sport, Department of Tourism and Recreation, Gdansk, Poland ; Pomeranian Medical University, Department of Clinical and Molecular Biochemistry, Szczecin, Poland.
K FicekUniversity of Szczecin, Department of Physical Culture and Health Promotion, Szczecin, Poland.
A Maciejewska-KarlowskaUniversity of Szczecin, Department of Physical Culture and Health Promotion, Szczecin, Poland.
M SawczukUniversity of Szczecin, Department of Physical Culture and Health Promotion, Szczecin, Poland.
A Leońska-DuniecUniversity of Szczecin, Department of Physical Culture and Health Promotion, Szczecin, Poland.
P KrolUniversity of Rzeszów, Department of Physical Culture, Rzeszow, Poland.
P CieszczykUniversity of Szczecin, Department of Physical Culture and Health Promotion, Szczecin, Poland.
P ZmijewskiInstitute of Sport, Department of Physiology, Institute of Sport, Warsaw, Poland.
N EynonInstitute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living (ISEAL), Victoria University, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The GSTP1 c.313A>G polymorphism is a candidate to explain some of the individual differences in cardiorespiratory fitness phenotypes' responses to aerobic exercise training. We aim to explore the association between the GSTP1 c.313A>G polymorphism and the response to low-high impact aerobic exercise training. Sixty-six Polish Caucasian women were genotyped for the GSTP1 c.313A>G polymorphism; 62 of them completed 12-week aerobic (50-75% HRmax) exercise training and were measured for selected somatic features (body mass and BMI) and cardiorespiratory fitness indices - maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max, maximum heart rate (HRmax), maximum ventilation (VEmax) and anaerobic threshold (AT) - before and after the training period. Two-factor analysis of variance revealed a main training effect for body mass reduction (p=0.007) and BMI reduction (p=0.013), improvements of absolute and relative VO2max (both p<0.001), and increased VEmax (p=0.005), but not for changes in fat-free mass (FFM) (p=0.162). However, a significant training x GSTP1 c.313A>G interaction was found only for FFM (p=0.042), absolute and relative VO2max (p=0.029 and p=0.026), and VEmax (p=0.005). As the result of training, significantly greater improvements in VO2max, VEmax and FFM were gained by the GG+GA group compared to the AA genotype group. The results support the hypothesis that heterogeneity in individual response to training stimuli is at least in part determined by genetics, and GSTP1 c.313A>G may be considered as one (of what appear to be many) target polymorphisms to influence these changes.

Indexed as

athletic performanceexercisegenespolymorphism

Identifiers

PMID25435667
PMCPMC4203841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.