Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25435476›Full record

ReviewCritical care clinics2015

The interface between monitoring and physiology at the bedside.

Eliezer L Bose, Marilyn Hravnak, Michael R Pinsky

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care clinics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eliezer L BoseDepartment of Acute and Tertiary Care, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, 336 Victoria Hall, 3500 Victoria Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Marilyn HravnakDepartment of Acute and Tertiary Care, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, 3500 Victoria Street, 336 Victoria Building, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. Electronic address: mhra@pitt.edu.
Michael R PinskyDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 606 Scaife Hall, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Predicting Patient Instability Noninvasively for Nursing Care-Two (PPINNC-2)R01NR013912 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI AL-ZAITI, SALAH S, CLERMONT, GILLES · 2012 to 2025
$7.0M
NINR NIH HHS 1R01NR013912NINR NIH HHS R01 NR013912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemodynamic instability as a clinical state represents either a perfusion failure with clinical manifestations of circulatory shock or heart failure or 1 or more out-of-threshold hemodynamic monitoring values, which may not necessarily be pathologic. Different types of causes of circulatory shock require different types of treatment modalities, making these distinctions important. Diagnostic approaches or therapies based on data derived from hemodynamic monitoring assume that specific patterns of derangements reflect specific disease processes, which respond to appropriate interventions. Hemodynamic monitoring at the bedside improves patient outcomes when used to make treatment decisions at the right time for patients experiencing hemodynamic instability.

Indexed as

Monitoring, PhysiologicPoint-of-Care SystemsArterial PressureCritical CareHemodynamicsHumansHypotensionOxygenOxygenHemodynamic instabilityHemodynamic monitoringShock

Identifiers

PMID25435476
PMCPMC4251708
OpenAlexW1988926817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.