Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25434303›Full record

Trial reportLeukemia2015

Hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with intermediate and high-risk AML: results from the randomized Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL) AML 2003 trial.

J Schetelig, M Schaich, K Schäfer-Eckart, M Hänel, W E Aulitzky, H Einsele, N Schmitz, W Rösler, M Stelljes, C D Baldus and 16 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Leukemia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Point Mutations in theFrontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

J Schetelig1] Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus der TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany [2] DKMS, German Bone Marrow Donor Center, Dresden, Germany.
M SchaichMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus der TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
K Schäfer-EckartStädtisches Klinikum Nord, Medizinische Klinik 5, Nürnberg, Germany.
M HänelKlinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Chemnitz, Germany.
W E AulitzkyRobert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Abteilung für Hämatologie, Onkologie und Palliativmedizin, Stuttgart, Germany.
H EinseleMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
N SchmitzAsklepios Klinik St Georg, Abteilung für Hämatologie, Onkologie und Stammzelltransplantation, Hamburg, Germany.
W RöslerUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen, Medizinische Klinik 5, Erlangen, Germany.
M StelljesMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik A, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany.
C D BaldusCharité Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
A D HoMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Abteilung Innere Medizin V, Hämatologie, Onkologie und Rheumatologie, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
A NeubauerKliniken für Innere Medizin, Hämatologie/Onkologie und Immunologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
H ServeMedizinische Klinik II, Klinikum der J.W. Goethe Universität, Frankfurt, Germany.
J MayerDepartment of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
W E BerdelMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik A, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany.
B MohrMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus der TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
U OelschlägelMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus der TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
S ParmentierMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus der TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
C RölligMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus der TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
M KramerMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus der TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
U PlatzbeckerMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus der TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
T IllmerMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus der TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
C ThiedeMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus der TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
M BornhäuserMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus der TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
G EhningerMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus der TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Study Alliance Leukemia
TU Dresden · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DEAsklepios Klinik St. Georg · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEChirurgische Universitätsklinik Heidelberg · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEKlinikum Chemnitz · DENuremberg Hospital · DERobert Bosch Hospital · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversity Hospital Brno · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal timing of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is controversial. We report on 1179 patients with a median age of 48 years who were randomized upfront. In the control arm, sibling HCT was scheduled in the first complete remission for intermediate-risk or high-risk AML and matched unrelated HCT in complex karyotype AML. In the experimental arm, matched unrelated HCT in first remission was offered also to patients with an FLT3-ITD (FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication) allelic ratio >0.8, poor day +15 marrow blast clearance and adverse karyotypes. Further, allogeneic HCT was recommended in high-risk AML to be performed in aplasia after induction chemotherapy. In the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis, superiority of the experimental transplant strategy could not be shown with respect to overall survival (OS) or event-free survival. As-treated analyses suggest a profound effect of allogeneic HCT on OS (HR 0.73; P=0.002) and event-free survival (HR 0.67; P<0.001). In high-risk patients, OS was significantly improved after allogeneic HCT in aplasia (HR 0.64; P=0.046) and after HCT in remission (HR 0.74; P=0.03). Although superiority of one study arm could not be demonstrated in the ITT analysis, secondary analyses suggest that early allogeneic HCT is a promising strategy for patients with high-risk AML.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationAdolescentAdultAllelesDisease-Free SurvivalFemalefms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3Gene Expression Regulation, LeukemicHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKaryotypingLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRemission InductionFLT3 protein, humanfms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3

Identifiers

PMID25434303
OpenAlexW1999244706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.