Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25433500›Full record

SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2015

Serum autoantibodies in the early detection of esophageal cancer: a systematic review.

Hongfei Zhang, Junfen Xia, Kaijuan Wang, Jianying Zhang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Expression of TP53, BCL-2, and VEGFA Genes in Esophagus Carcinoma and its Biological Significance.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2015
    Article
  20. Association between TCF7L2 polymorphisms and breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hongfei ZhangCollege of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, No. 100 Kexue Avenue, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Junfen Xia
Kaijuan Wang
Jianying Zhang
Zhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibodies against tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) have been found in serum of patients with various types of cancers and may serve as biomarkers for early detection of esophageal cancer as well. This systematic review aims to give an overview about known autoantibodies and their diagnostic value in esophageal cancer. We conducted a systematic literature search in two databases to identify studies which performed serological testing for autoantibodies in esophageal cancer patients and controls. Data on study characteristics and results were extracted independently by two reviewers. Overall, 45 articles reporting the detection of 35 different autoantibodies met the inclusion criteria of this review. The most common antibody detection method was enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the most frequently assessed autoantibody was anti-p53, which was tested in 17 studies and for 15 studies of which a meta-analysis was conducted to comprehensively evaluate the diagnostic value. Most antibodies were assessed in only one study, and only few authors have evaluated the diagnostic value of combinations of multiple autoantibodies. For single autoantibodies, specificity was generally very high (median 98.3 %), but sensitivity was mostly rather low (median 26.7 %). For some autoantibody combinations, substantially higher sensitivity at reasonably high levels of specificity could be achieved. Development of extended and optimized multimarker panels of autoantibodies might be a promising approach for esophageal cancer early detection.

Indexed as

Antibodies, NeoplasmAutoantibodiesBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Squamous CellEarly Detection of CancerEsophageal NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm StagingAntibodies, NeoplasmAutoantibodiesBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID25433500
OpenAlexW2086247454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.