Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25433410›Full record

Observational studyBMC family practice2014

Use of exercise tests in primary care: importance for referral decisions and possible bias in the decision process; a prospective observational study.

Gunnar Nilsson, Thomas Mooe, Lars Söderström, Eva Samuelsson

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC family practice, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Prevalence of primary aldosteronism in primary care: a cross-sectional study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  3. Role of Perceptual Factors on Endurance Profiles on Treadmill Exercise.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gunnar NilssonDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. gunnar.nilsson@jll.se.
Thomas MooeDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. thomas.mooe@medicin.umu.se.
Lars SöderströmUnit of Research, Education and Development, Östersund Hospital, Östersund, Sweden. lars.soderstrom@jll.se.
Eva SamuelssonDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. eva.samuelsson@umu.se.
Östersunds Hospital · SEUmeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe utility of clinical exercise tests depends on their support of treatment decisions. We sought to assess the utility of exercise tests for the selection of primary-care patients for referral to cardiologic care, and to determine whether referral decisions were biased by gender or socioeconomic status. We also evaluated referral rates and cardiovascular events in patients with positive exercise tests.

methodsWe designed a prospective observational study of 438 men and 427 women from 28 Swedish primary-care clinics who were examined with exercise testing for suspected coronary disease. All participants were followed-up with respect to cardiologist referrals and cardiovascular events (hospitalisation for unstable angina, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death) within six months and revascularisation within 250 days. Variables associated with referral were identified by multivariable logistic regression. Socioeconomic status was determined by educational level and employment.

resultsPositive/inconclusive exercise tests and exertional chest pain predicted referral in men and women. Of 865 participants, patients with positive, inconclusive, or negative exercise tests were referred to cardiologists in 67.3%, 26.1%, and 3.5% of cases, respectively. Overall, there was no significant difference in referral rates related to gender or socioeconomic level. Self-employed women were referred more frequently compared to other women (odds ratio (OR) 3.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19-10.99). Among non-manual employees, women were referred to cardiologic examination less frequently than men (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.16-1.00; p = 0.049; ORs adjusted for age, exertional chest pain, and exercise test result). In patients with positive exercise tests, the referral rate decreased continuously with age (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.23-0.97; adjusted for cardiovascular co-morbidity). Cardiovascular events occurred in 22.2% (4/18) of non-referred patients with positive exercise tests; 56% (10/18) of these patients were not considered for cardiologic care, with continuity problems in primary care as one possible contributing cause.

conclusionsExercise tests are important for selecting patients for referral to cardiologic care. Interactions related to gender and socioeconomic status affected referral rates. In patients with positive exercise tests, referral rates decreased with age. An increased awareness of possible bias regarding age, gender, and socioeconomic status, which may influence medical decisions, is therefore necessary.

Indexed as

Practice Patterns, Physicians'Referral and ConsultationAgedAngina, UnstableCoronary DiseaseDecision MakingEducational StatusEmploymentExercise TestFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial Revascularization

Identifiers

PMID25433410
PMCPMC4276015
OpenAlexW2122818870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.