Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25433372›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2014

Designing effective visualizations of habits data to aid clinical decision making.

Joost de Folter, Hulya Gokalp, Joanna Fursse, Urvashi Sharma, Malcolm Clarke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Integrated Telehealth and Telecare for Monitoring Frail Elderly with Chronic Disease.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2018
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Smartphone Data in Rheumatoid Arthritis - What Do Rheumatologists Want?AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joost de FolterBrunel University, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, UK. joost.defolter@brunel.ac.uk.
Hulya GokalpBrunel University, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, UK. hulya.gokalp@brunel.ac.uk.
Joanna FursseChorleywood Health Centre, 15 Lower Rd, Chorleywood, Rickmansworth, WD3 5EA, UK. j.fursse@gmail.com.
Urvashi SharmaBrunel University, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, UK. urvashi.sharma@brunel.ac.uk.
Malcolm ClarkeBrunel University, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, UK. malcolm.clarke@brunel.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChanges in daily habits can provide important information regarding the overall health status of an individual. This research aimed to determine how meaningful information may be extracted from limited sensor data and transformed to provide clear visualization for the clinicians who must use and interact with the data and make judgments on the condition of patients. We ascertained that a number of insightful features related to habits and physical condition could be determined from usage and motion sensor data.

methodsOur approach to the design of the visualization follows User Centered Design, specifically, defining requirements, designing corresponding visualizations and finally evaluating results. This cycle was iterated three times.

resultsThe User Centered Design method was successfully employed to converge to a design that met the main objective of this study. The resulting visualizations of relevant features that were extracted from the sensor data were considered highly effective and intuitive to the clinicians and were considered suitable for monitoring the behavior patterns of patients.

conclusionsWe observed important differences in the approach and attitude of the researchers and clinicians. Whereas the researchers would prefer to have as many features and information as possible in each visualization, the clinicians would prefer clarity and simplicity, often each visualization having only a single feature, with several visualizations per page. In addition, concepts considered intuitive to the researchers were not always to the clinicians.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyHabitsPattern Recognition, VisualAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelDecision Support Systems, ClinicalEquipment DesignEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMonitoring, AmbulatoryMotionQualitative ResearchTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID25433372
PMCPMC4265320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.