ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2014
Designing effective visualizations of habits data to aid clinical decision making.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementing 360° Quantified Self for childhood obesity: feasibility study and experiences from a weight loss camp in Qatar.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2017Trial
- A Review of Sensor-Based Interventions for Supporting Patient Adherence to Inhalation Therapy.Patient preference and adherence · 2024Review
- Integrated Telehealth and Telecare for Monitoring Frail Elderly with Chronic Disease.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2018Review
- Investigating User Identification in Remote Patient Monitoring Devices.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- Iterative User Interface Design for Automated Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score Calculator in Sepsis Detection.JMIR human factors · 2017Article
- Is Technology Present in Frailty? Technology a Back-up Tool for Dealing with Frailty in the Elderly: A Systematic Review.Aging and disease · 2017Review
- Technology-based measurements for screening, monitoring and preventing frailty.Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2016Review
- Smartphone Data in Rheumatoid Arthritis - What Do Rheumatologists Want?AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChanges in daily habits can provide important information regarding the overall health status of an individual. This research aimed to determine how meaningful information may be extracted from limited sensor data and transformed to provide clear visualization for the clinicians who must use and interact with the data and make judgments on the condition of patients. We ascertained that a number of insightful features related to habits and physical condition could be determined from usage and motion sensor data.
methodsOur approach to the design of the visualization follows User Centered Design, specifically, defining requirements, designing corresponding visualizations and finally evaluating results. This cycle was iterated three times.
resultsThe User Centered Design method was successfully employed to converge to a design that met the main objective of this study. The resulting visualizations of relevant features that were extracted from the sensor data were considered highly effective and intuitive to the clinicians and were considered suitable for monitoring the behavior patterns of patients.
conclusionsWe observed important differences in the approach and attitude of the researchers and clinicians. Whereas the researchers would prefer to have as many features and information as possible in each visualization, the clinicians would prefer clarity and simplicity, often each visualization having only a single feature, with several visualizations per page. In addition, concepts considered intuitive to the researchers were not always to the clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.