Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25432953›Full record

Trial reportCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2015

Effects of tailored risk communications for skin cancer prevention and detection: the PennSCAPE randomized trial.

Karen Glanz, Kathryn Volpicelli, Christopher Jepson, Michael E Ming, Lynn M Schuchter, Katrina Armstrong

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Personalizing cancer risk: a systematic review of risk communication strategies.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Impact of personal genomic risk information on melanoma prevention behaviors and psychological outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Trial
  5. The Effects of Personalizing Colorectal Cancer Risk Communication on Risk Perceptions and Health Behavior Intentions: a Randomized Trial of Average-Risk Adults.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Tailored Sun Safety Messages for Outdoor Workers.Safety and health at work · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Real-time sun protection decisions in first-degree relatives of melanoma patients.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Sun Protection Belief Clusters: Analysis of Amazon Mechanical Turk Data.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karen GlanzPerelman School of Medicine and School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. kglanz@upenn.edu.
Kathryn VolpicelliPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Christopher JepsonPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Michael E MingPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Lynn M SchuchterPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Katrina ArmstrongMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
University of Pennsylvania · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Comparative Effectiveness in Genomic MedicineUC2CA148310 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ARMSTRONG, KATRINA · 2009 to 2010
$4.0M
NCI NIH HHS 5UC2 CA148310NCI NIH HHS UC2 CA148310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevention and early detection measures for melanoma, such as sun avoidance and skin examinations, are important, but are practiced inconsistently. In this replication of the Project SCAPE trial, we sought to determine whether tailored print materials were more effective at improving adherence than generic print materials for patients at increased risk of skin cancer.

methodsParticipants were randomized to receive personalized mailed communications about their skin cancer risk and recommended sun protection, or generic mailings. Participants were Caucasian adults, at moderate or high risk for skin cancer, recruited in outpatient primary care. The main outcomes were overall sun protection behaviors and specific protective behaviors including use of sunscreen, shirt, hat, sunglasses, shade, and sun avoidance; recent sunburns; and skin self-examination and provider skin examination.

resultsOne hundred ninety-two (93.2%) subjects completed the study. Six outcome variables showed significant intervention condition effects in mixed effects models: overall sun protection behavior (P = 0.025); sunscreen use (P = 0.026); use of sunglasses (P = 0.011); sunburns in the past three months (P = 0.033); recency of last skin self-exam (P = 0.017); and frequency of skin exams by health care provider (P = 0.016).

conclusionsRelative to generic communications, tailored risk communications resulted in improved adherence to six skin cancer protective behaviors, including a composite sun protection behavior measure, sunburns, and health care provider skin examinations. IMPACT: Tailored interventions can be more effective in improving patient prevention behaviors than nontailored, generic information for patients at moderate to high risk of skin cancer.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth CommunicationHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSkin NeoplasmsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25432953
PMCPMC4323936
OpenAlexW2131590887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.