Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25432870›Full record

ArticleDer Radiologe2014

[Current classification of interstitial pulmonary diseases].

J Vogel-Claussen, A Prasse

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Radiologe, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J Vogel-ClaussenInstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland, Vogel-Claussen.Jens@mh-hannover.de.
A Prasse
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe consensus classification of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP, also known as pulmonary fibrosis) in 2002 has undergone a significant revision in 2013.

objectivesWhat are the key points of the new consensus statement of the American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) from 2013 for the classification of pulmonary fibrosis? MATERIAL AND

methodsEvaluation of the available literature on the subject of pulmonary fibrosis in Pubmed.

resultsThe interdisciplinary approach (i.e. pulmonology, radiology and pathology) for the diagnosis of lung fibrosis subtypes is highlighted. Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) is now a separate specific form of pulmonary fibrosis. Smoking-associated respiratory bronchiolitis with interstitial lung disease (RB-ILD) is now frequently diagnosed without a lung biopsy on the basis of clinical findings, computed tomography and bronchoalveolar lavage. The heterogeneous course of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is now recognized. The term "acute exacerbation" will now be used for acute attacks (< 30 days) in patients with chronic lung fibrosis (IPF and NSIP). It has been recognized that it is necessary to provide a clinical classification algorithm for the management of IIP cases. Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) is recognized as a rare new entity of pulmonary fibrosis. The rapidly evolving field of molecular markers is promising for improving the diagnostic approach.

conclusionThe 2013 ATS/ERS update is a supplement to the previous classification of lung fibrosis from 2002. It outlines progress in recent years and shows potential areas for future innovations.

Indexed as

Lung Diseases, InterstitialPractice Guidelines as TopicTerminology as TopicTomography, X-Ray ComputedConsensus Statements as TopicHumansPulmonary MedicineRadiologyUnited States

Identifiers

PMID25432870
OpenAlexW131070448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.