Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25432794›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic pathology2014

Solitary fibrous tumor - clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical and molecular analysis of 28 cases.

Rob J C Vogels, Myrella Vlenterie, Yvonne M H Versleijen-Jonkers, Emiel Ruijter, Elise M Bekers, Marian A J Verdijk, Monique M Link, Johannes J Bonenkamp, Winette T A van der Graaf, Pieter J Slootweg and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Unique Spectrum ofThe application of clinical genetics · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Molecular changes in solitary fibrous tumor progression.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2019
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rob J C VogelsDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. rob.vogels@radboudumc.nl.
Myrella VlenterieDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Myrella.Vlenterie@radboudumc.nl.
Yvonne M H Versleijen-JonkersDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Yvonne.Versleijen-Jonkers@radboudumc.nl.
Emiel RuijterDepartment of Pathology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands. ERuijter@rijnstate.nl.
Elise M BekersDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Elise.Bekers@radboudumc.nl.
Marian A J VerdijkDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Marian.Verdijk@radboudumc.nl.
Monique M LinkDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Monique.Link@radboudumc.nl.
Johannes J BonenkampDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Han.Bonenkamp@radboudumc.nl.
Winette T A van der GraafDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Winette.vanderGraaf@radboudumc.nl.
Pieter J SlootwegDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Piet.Slootweg@radboudumc.nl.
Albert J H SuurmeijerDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. a.j.h.suurmeijer@umcg.nl.
Patricia J T A GroenenDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Patricia.Groenen@radboudumc.nl.
Uta FluckeDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Uta.Flucke@radboudumc.nl.
Radboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLRijnstate Hospital · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSolitary fibrous tumor is a mesenchymal tumor of fibroblastic type, which can affect any region of the body. Recently, a recurrent gene fusion NAB2-STAT6 has been identified as molecular hallmark. The NAB2-STAT6 fusion leads to EGR1 activation and transcriptional deregulation of EGR1-dependent target genes and is a driving event in initiation of SFT. In this study, we report the clinicopathologic and RT-PCR findings and evaluated expression of STAT6 and EGR1 protein in a cohort of 28 SFTs.

methods28 patients with a median age of 54 years were included with SFTs originating at different sites, most occurring in the lung and pleura (9, 32%), 5 in soft tissues of the lower extremities (18%) and 5 in the head and neck (18%). For detection of the NAB2-STAT6 fusion gene, RT-PCR was performed using RNA extracted from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues. Immunohistochemistry was performed on all cases with antibodies against STAT6 and EGR1.

resultsAll patients were treated by surgery, 3 with adjuvant chemo- or radiotherapy. Follow-up data of 18 patients could be obtained of which 2 patients died of metastatic disease 13 months and 52 years after first diagnosis. Sixteen patients have no evidence of disease with a median follow up of 29.5 months (range 7 - 120 months). NAB2-STAT6 fusion transcripts were found in 19/28 cases (68%). The most common fusion was between NAB2 exon 4 and STAT6 exon 3 (11/19, 58%), mainly occurring in pleuropulmonary lesions. All cases showed strong nuclear expression of STAT6 (28/28, 100%) while EGR1 showed low-level variable nuclear expression in all samples, comparable with the EGR1 expression results of the control group.

conclusionsThe identification of the NAB2-STAT6 fusion in SFTs can provide important diagnostic information, especially in cases with aberrant morphology or when biopsy material is limited. STAT6 immunohistochemistry is another useful tool in diagnosing SFT. EGR1 immunohistochemistry indicates low-level protein expression in accordance with EGR1 activation due to distorted NAB2 activity. VIRTUAL SLIDES: The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/13000_2014_224.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorImmunohistochemistryRepressor ProteinsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSTAT6 Transcription FactorAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEarly Growth Response Protein 1FemaleGene FusionHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsSolitary Fibrous TumorsBiomarkers, TumorEarly Growth Response Protein 1EGR1 protein, humanNAB2 protein, humanRepressor ProteinsSTAT6 protein, humanSTAT6 Transcription Factor

Identifiers

PMID25432794
PMCPMC4264260
OpenAlexW2147372043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.