Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25432633›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2015

A systematic review and meta-analysis of social cognitive theory-based physical activity and/or nutrition behavior change interventions for cancer survivors.

Fiona G Stacey, Erica L James, Kathy Chapman, Kerry S Courneya, David R Lubans

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 190 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
190citing papers in PubMed, 18 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06624930 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Controlled Trial Adding Behavioural Counselling to Supervised Physical Activity in Cancer Survivors

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of TorontoRan2024 to 2029Enrolled236ConditionsCancer, ExerciseArmsBehavioural Counselling, Exercise Counselling
NCT07032584 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Multimodal Telerehabilitation on Reducing Disparities in Rural Survivors of Metastatic Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2025 to 2029Enrolled74ConditionsProstate Cancer, Metastatic Prostate Cancer, Androgen Deprivation TherapyArmsTelerehabilitation Intervention
NCT07093177 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Multimodal Telerehabilitation of Rural Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2026 to 2028Enrolled30ConditionsProstate CancerArmsTelerehabilitation Unit
NCT07390071 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Multimodal Telerehabilitation in Patients Undergoing CAR-T Cell Immunotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2025 to 2029Enrolled40ConditionsLymphoma, Myeloma, Cytokine Release Syndrome, Immune Effector Cell Associated Neurotoxicity SyndromeArmsHome Automated Telemanagement (HAT) Patient Unit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

190 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 413 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Effects of internet-based digital health interventions on the physical activity and quality of life of colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Dietary interventions for adult cancer survivors.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  13. Systematic review and meta-analysis of maintenance of physical activity behaviour change in cancer survivors.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2019
    Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

130 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fiona G StaceySchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, W4, HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia, fiona.stacey@newcastle.edu.au.
Erica L James
Kathy Chapman
Kerry S Courneya
David R Lubans
University of Newcastle Australia · AUCancer Council NSW · AUUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLittle is known about how to improve and create sustainable lifestyle behaviors of cancer survivors. Interventions based on social cognitive theory (SCT) have shown promise. This review examined the effect of SCT-based physical activity and nutrition interventions that target cancer survivors and identified factors associated with their efficacy.

methodsA systematic search of seven databases identified randomized controlled trials that (i) targeted adult cancer survivors (any point from diagnosis); (ii) reported a primary outcome of physical activity, diet, or weight management; and (iii) included an SCT-based intervention targeting physical activity or diet. Qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis were conducted. Theoretical constructs and intervention characteristics were examined to identify factors associated with intervention efficacy.

resultsEighteen studies (reported in 33 publications) met review inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis (n = 12) revealed a significant intervention effect for physical activity (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.33; P < 0.01). Most studies (six out of eight) that targeted dietary change reported significant improvements in at least one aspect of diet quality. No SCT constructs were associated with intervention effects. There were no consistent trends relating to intervention delivery method or whether the intervention targeted single or multiple behaviors.

conclusionsSCT-based interventions demonstrate promise in improving physical activity and diet behavior in cancer survivors, using a range of intervention delivery modes. Further work is required to understand how and why these interventions offer promise for improving behavior. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: SCT-based interventions targeting diet or physical activity are safe and result in meaningful changes to diet and physical activity behavior that can result in health improvements.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsSurvivorsAdultBehavior TherapyCognitionCognitive Behavioral TherapyCombined Modality TherapyDietFeeding BehaviorHumansLife StyleMotor ActivityNeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID25432633
PMCPMC4441740
OpenAlexW1986462132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.