ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2015
[Clostridium difficile in visceral surgery].
Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Real-World Study on the Clinical Characteristics, Outcomes, and Relationship between Antibiotic Exposure andAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Consumption of Antibiotics and Epidemiology ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- WSES guidelines for management of Clostridium difficile infection in surgical patients.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2015Review
- 2019 update of the WSES guidelines for management ofWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJESReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFor surgeons the early identification of patients with clostridium difficile infections (CDI) is important, because the incidence and virulence of this potentially life-threatening disease are increasing.
objectivesThe aim of this study was to describe the frequency of CDI among surgical patients, to analyze which treatment was successful and to define which factors were associated with mortality.
methodsA retrospective analysis of patients with CDI was performed.
resultsFrom January 2004 to June 2012 the overall incidence of CDI among all departments at the St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum was 0.6 % (1669 out of 301,919 patients). In 2004 the number of surgical patients with CDI was 1 which increased to 41 in 2011. Before the diagnosis of CDI was made 84 % (151 out of 179) of patients had received an antibiotic treatment. Conservative management of CDI was performed with metronidazole in 75 % (134 out of 179), 60 % (107 out of 179) received vancomycin, while 44 % (79 out of 179) received a combination of metronidazole and vancomycin, tygecycline or fidaxomidin. The overall mortality was 7 % (12 out of 179). There was a significant association with mortality for patients with sepsis, readmission to the intensive care unit (ICU), requirement for vasopressor therapy and intubation with mechanical ventilation. In 4 % of patients (7 out of 179) colectomy was carried out. Despite maximum intensive care management, 86 % (6 out of 7) of patients who underwent colectomy ultimately died.
conclusionAlthough conservative management is successful for most patients with CDI, the mortality is high for patients who require intensive care management secondary to CDI. Mortality after colectomy for CDI is almost 100 %, mostly because the operation is usually only performed as a last resort in patients with sepsis. The most important risk factor for CDI is a prior antibiotic therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.