ArticleBMC plant biology2014
Molecular evaluation of orphan Afghan common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) landraces collected by Dr. Kihara using single nucleotide polymorphic markers.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a high-density 'Amahysnp' genotyping array in grain amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus).BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Genetic diversity and population structure of rice (Oryza sativa L.) landraces from Kerala, India analyzed through genotyping-by-sequencing.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2022Article
- Weed competitive ability in wheat: a peek through in its functional significance, present status and future prospects.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2021Review
- Article
- Agro-Morphological, Yield, and Genotyping-by-Sequencing Data of Selected Wheat (Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Genome- wide structural and functional variant discovery of rice landraces using genotyping by sequencing.Molecular biology reports · 2020Article
- Appraisal of wheat genomics for gene discovery and breeding applications: a special emphasis on advances in Asia.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2020Review
- Genomic analysis of Spanish wheat landraces reveals their variability and potential for breeding.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Characterization of genetic diversity and population structure in wheat using array based SNP markers.Molecular biology reports · 2020Article
- Tracking the adoption of bread wheat varieties in Afghanistan using DNA fingerprinting.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Imputation accuracy of wheat genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) data using barley and wheat genome references.PloS one · 2019Article
- Wheat genetic resources in the post-genomics era: promise and challenges.Annals of botany · 2018Review
- Article
- Genetic Diversity, Population Structure and Ancestral Origin of Australian Wheat.Frontiers in plant science · 2017Article
- Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) Revealed Molecular Genetic Diversity of Iranian Wheat Landraces and Cultivars.Frontiers in plant science · 2017Article
- Development of pre-breeding technology for root system study and selection of Kihara Afghan wheat landraces (KAWLR) to enhance wheat breeding in the rain-fed region.Breeding science · 2016Article
- Analysis of grain elements and identification of best genotypes for Fe and P in Afghan wheat landraces.Breeding science · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLandraces are an important source of genetic diversity in common wheat, but archival collections of Afghan wheat landraces remain poorly characterised. The recent development of array based marker systems, particularly single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers, provide an excellent tool for examining the genetic diversity of local populations. Here we used SNP analysis to demonstrate the importance of Afghan wheat landraces and found tremendous genetic diversity and province-specific characteristics unique to this geographic region.
resultsA total of 446 Afghan wheat landraces were analysed using genotype by sequencing (GBS) arrays containing ~10 K unique markers. Pair-wise genetic distance analyses revealed significant genetic distances between landraces, particularly among those collected from distanced provinces. From these analyses, we were able to divide the landraces into 14 major classes, with the greatest degree of diversity evident among landraces isolated from Badakhshan province. Population-based analyses revealed an additional 15 sub-populations within our germplasm, and significant correlations were evident in both the provincial and botanical varieties. Genetic distance analysis was used to identify differences among provinces, with the strongest correlations seen between landraces from Herat and Ghor province, followed closely by those between Badakhshan and Takhar provinces. This result closely resembles existing agro-climatic zones within Afghanistan, as well as the wheat varieties commonly cultivated within these regions. Molecular variance analysis showed a higher proportion of intra-province variation among landraces compared with variation among all landraces as a whole.
conclusionThe SNP analyses presented here highlight the importance and genetic diversity of Afghan wheat landraces. Furthermore, these data strongly refute a previous analysis that suggested low genetic diverse within this germplasm. Ongoing analyses include phenotypic characterisation of these landraces to identify functional traits associated with individual genotypes. Taken together, these analyses can be used to help improve wheat cultivation in Afghanistan, while providing insights into the evolution and selective pressures underlying these distinct landraces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.