Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25432131›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychiatry2014

Atypical antipsychotic augmentation in SSRI treatment refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

David Veale, Sarah Miles, Nicola Smallcombe, Haben Ghezai, Ben Goldacre, John Hodsoll

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 151 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Clinical Advances in Treatment Strategies for Obsessive-compulsive Disorder in Adults.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David VealeThe Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, 16 De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK. david.veale@kcl.ac.uk.
Sarah MilesThe Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, 16 De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK. sarah.k.miles@kcl.ac.uk.
Nicola SmallcombeKings College London Medical School, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK. nicola.smallcombe@kcl.ac.uk.
Haben GhezaiThe Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, 16 De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK. haben.ghezai@kcl.ac.uk.
Ben GoldacreLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. ben.goldacre@lshtm.ac.uk.
John HodsollThe Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, 16 De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK. john.hodsoll@kcl.ac.uk.
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College School · GBUniversity of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2006, the National Institute of Clinical and Health Excellence (NICE) guidelines for Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) recommended anti-psychotics as a class for SSRI treatment resistant OCD. The article aims to systematically review and conduct a meta-analysis on the clinical effectiveness of atypical anti-psychotics augmenting an SSRI.

methodsStudies that were double-blind randomized controlled trials of an atypical antipsychotic against a placebo, for a minimum of 4 weeks, in adults with OCD, were included. Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) scores were the primary outcome measure. Inclusion criteria included Y-BOCS score of 16 or more and at least one adequate trial of a SSRI or clomipramine for at least 8 weeks prior to randomization. Data sources included Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), trial registries and pharmaceutical databases and manufacturers up to September 2013. Forest-plots were drawn to display differences between drug and placebo on the Y-BOCS.

resultsTwo studies found aripiprazole to be effective in the short-term. There was a small effect-size for risperidone or anti-psychotics in general in the short-term. We found no evidence for the effectiveness of quetiapine or olanzapine in comparison to placebo.

conclusionsRisperidone and aripiprazole can be used cautiously at a low dose as an augmentation agent in non-responders to SSRIs and CBT but should be monitored at 4 weeks to determine efficacy.

Indexed as

AdultAntipsychotic AgentsAripiprazoleBenzodiazepinesClomipramineDibenzothiazepinesDouble-Blind MethodDrug ResistanceDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansObsessive-Compulsive DisorderOlanzapinePiperazinesQuetiapine FumarateQuinolonesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntipsychotic AgentsAripiprazoleBenzodiazepinesClomipramineDibenzothiazepinesOlanzapinePiperazinesQuetiapine FumarateQuinolonesRisperidoneSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID25432131
PMCPMC4262998
OpenAlexW2067425354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.