Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25432012›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2014

Recent advances in the chemical composition of propolis.

Shuai Huang, Cui-Ping Zhang, Kai Wang, George Q Li, Fu-Liang Hu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 278 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
278citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

278 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. In Situ ThaiPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

218 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shuai HuangCollege of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China. asmallcaths@163.com.
Cui-Ping ZhangCollege of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China. lgzcplyx@aliyun.com.
Kai WangCollege of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China. kaiwang628@gmail.com.
George Q LiFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. george.li@sydney.edu.au.
Fu-Liang HuCollege of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China. flhu@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Propolis is a honeybee product with broad clinical applications. Current literature describes that propolis is collected from plant resins. From a systematic database search, 241 compounds were identified in propolis for the first time between 2000 and 2012; and they belong to such diverse chemical classes as flavonoids, phenylpropanoids, terpenenes, stilbenes, lignans, coumarins, and their prenylated derivatives, showing a pattern consistent with around 300 previously reported compounds. The chemical characteristics of propolis are linked to the diversity of geographical location, plant sources and bee species.

Indexed as

AnimalsBeesElementsGeographyOrganic ChemicalsPlantsPropolisElementsOrganic ChemicalsPropolis

Identifiers

PMID25432012
PMCPMC6271758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.