Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25431998›Full record

ArticleThe Permanente journal2015

Financial implications of the continuity of primary care.

Marcus J Hollander, Helena Kadlec

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Permanente journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cost savings from primary care clinic continuity among patients with chronic disease in Alberta, Canada: a retrospective population-level cross-sectional study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Toward a universal definition of provider-patient attachment in primary care.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The value of family medicine: An impossible job, done impossibly well.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Effects of the Full Service Family Practice Incentive Program.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2017
    Article
  14. Incentive funding in BC is a key factor for physicians to remain in family practice.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marcus J HollanderPresident of Hollander Analytical Services, Ltd, in Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. marcus@hollanderanalytical.com.
Helena KadlecSenior Scientist for Hollander Analytical Services, Ltd, in Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. helena@hollanderanalytical.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this study was to assess the financial implications of the continuity of care, for patients with high care needs, by examining the cost of government-funded health care services in British Columbia, Canada.

methodsUsing British Columbia Ministry of Health administrative databases for fiscal year 2010-2011 and generalized linear models, we estimated cost ratios for 10 cost-related predictor variables, including patients' attachment to the practice. Patients were selected and divided into groups on the basis of their Resource Utilization Band (RUB) and placement in provincial registries for 8 chronic conditions (1,619,941 patients). The final dataset included all high- and very-high-care-needs patients in British Columbia (ie, RUB categories 4 and 5) in 1 or more of the 8 registries who met the screening criteria (222,779 patients).

resultsOf the 10 predictors, across 8 medical conditions and both RUBs, patients' attachment to the practice had the strongest relationship to costs (correlations = -0.168 to -0.322). Higher attachment was associated with lower costs. Extrapolation of the findings indicated that an increase of 5% in the overall attachment level, for the selected high-care-needs patients, could have resulted in an estimated cost avoidance of $142 million Canadian for fiscal year 2010-2011.

conclusionsContinuity of care, defined as a patient's attachment to his/her primary care practice, can reduce health care costs over time and across chronic conditions. Health care policy makers may wish to consider creating opportunities for primary care physicians to increase the attachment that their high-care-needs patients have to their practices.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBritish ColumbiaContinuity of Patient CareFamily PracticeFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25431998
PMCPMC4315369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.