Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25431968›Full record

ReviewMarine drugs2014

Alternative methods for the detection of emerging marine toxins: biosensors, biochemical assays and cell-based assays.

Laia Reverté, Lucía Soliño, Olga Carnicer, Jorge Diogène, Mònica Campàs

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Marine drugs, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Further advance ofToxins · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laia RevertéIRTA, Carretera Poble Nou km 5.5, 43540 Sant Carles de la Ràpita, Spain. laia.reverte@irta.cat.
Lucía SoliñoIRTA, Carretera Poble Nou km 5.5, 43540 Sant Carles de la Ràpita, Spain. lucia.solino@irta.cat.
Olga CarnicerIRTA, Carretera Poble Nou km 5.5, 43540 Sant Carles de la Ràpita, Spain. olga.carnicer@irta.cat.
Jorge DiogèneIRTA, Carretera Poble Nou km 5.5, 43540 Sant Carles de la Ràpita, Spain. jorge.diogene@irta.cat.
Mònica CampàsIRTA, Carretera Poble Nou km 5.5, 43540 Sant Carles de la Ràpita, Spain. monica.campas@irta.cat.
Institute for Research and Technology in Food and Agriculture · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of marine toxins in water and seafood may have a considerable impact on public health. Although the tendency in Europe is to consolidate, when possible, official reference methods based on instrumental analysis, the development of alternative or complementary methods providing functional or toxicological information may provide advantages in terms of risk identification, but also low cost, simplicity, ease of use and high-throughput analysis. This article gives an overview of the immunoassays, cell-based assays, receptor-binding assays and biosensors that have been developed for the screening and quantification of emerging marine toxins: palytoxins, ciguatoxins, cyclic imines and tetrodotoxins. Their advantages and limitations are discussed, as well as their possible integration in research and monitoring programs.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological AssayBiosensing TechniquesFood ContaminationHumansMarine ToxinsSeafoodMarine Toxins

Identifiers

PMID25431968
PMCPMC4278199
OpenAlexW2158922561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.