Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25431281›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2014

Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus haemolyticus in companion animals: a cross-sectional study.

Modestas Ruzauskas, Rita Siugzdiniene, Irena Klimiene, Marius Virgailis, Raimundas Mockeliunas, Lina Vaskeviciute, Dainius Zienius

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Characteristics ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mucoid Staphylococcus haemolyticus: an unheeded multidrug-resistant pathogen.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation inArchives animal breeding · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Prevalence of Methicillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Modestas RuzauskasMicrobiology and Virology Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Mickeviciaus g, 9, Kaunas LT44307, Lithuania. ruzauskas@lva.lt.
Rita Siugzdiniene
Irena Klimiene
Marius Virgailis
Raimundas Mockeliunas
Lina Vaskeviciute
Dainius Zienius
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmong coagulase-negative staphylococci, Staphylococcus haemolyticus is the second most frequently isolated species from human blood cultures and has the highest level of antimicrobial resistance. This species has zoonotic character and is prevalent both in humans and animals. Recent studies have indicated that methicillin-resistant S. haemolyticus (MRSH) is one of the most frequent isolated Staphylococcus species among neonates in intensive care units. The aim of this study was to determine the presence of MRSH in different groups of companion animals and to characterize isolates according their antimicrobial resistance.

methodsSamples (n = 754) were collected from healthy and diseased dogs and cats, female dogs in pure-breed kennels, healthy horses, and kennel owners. Classical microbiological tests along with molecular testing including PCR and 16S rRNA sequencing were performed to identify MRSH. Clonality of the isolates was assessed by Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis using the SmaI restriction enzyme. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the broth micro-dilution method. Detection of genes encoding antimicrobial resistance was performed by PCR. Statistical analysis was performed using the R Project of Statistical Computing, "R 1.8.1" package.

resultsFrom a total of 754 samples tested, 12 MRSH isolates were obtained. No MRSH were found in horses and cats. Eleven isolates were obtained from dogs and one from a kennel owner. Ten of the dog isolates were detected in pure-breed kennels. The isolates demonstrated the same clonality only within separate kennels.The most frequent resistances of MRSH isolates was demonstrated to benzylpenicillin (91.7%), erythromycin (91.7%), gentamicin (75.0%), tetracycline (66.7%), fluoroquinolones (41.7%) and co-trimoxazole (41.7%). One isolate was resistant to streptogramins. All isolates were susceptible to daptomycin, rifampin, linezolid and vancomycin. The clone isolated from the kennel owner and one of the dogs was resistant to beta-lactams, macrolides, gentamicin and tetracycline.

conclusionsPure-breed kennels keeping 6 or more females were determined to be a risk factor for the presence of MRSH strains. MRSH isolated from companion animals were frequently resistant to some classes of critically important antimicrobials, although they remain susceptible to antibiotics used exclusively in human medicine.

Indexed as

Methicillin ResistanceAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarrier StateCatsCluster AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesDNA, BacterialDNA FingerprintingDNA, RibosomalDogsElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldGenes, BacterialGenotypeHorsesHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID25431281
PMCPMC4247881
OpenAlexW2146675677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.