Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25431259›Full record

SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2015

The clinical utility of microRNA-21 as novel biomarker for diagnosing human cancers.

Lijun Shen, Zhihong Wan, Yuming Ma, Libing Wu, Fangfang Liu, Hong Zang, Shaojie Xin

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Deciphering the biology of thymic epithelial tumors.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Considering Exosomal miR-21 as a Biomarker for Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2016
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lijun ShenMedical School of Chinese PLA, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, China, 100853.
Zhihong Wan
Yuming Ma
Libing Wu
Fangfang Liu
Hong Zang
Shaojie Xin
302 Military Hospital of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With cancer being a major cause of death worldwide, microRNAs (miRNAs) have been investigated as novel and non-invasive biomarkers for cancer diagnosis. Recently, microRNA-21 (miR-21) attracts much attention for its aberrant expression and has been widely studied in various cancers. However, the inconsistent results from studies make it hard to evaluate the diagnostic value of miR-21 in cancer diagnosis, which lead us to conduct this meta-analysis. We conducted a comprehensive literature search in the Medline, Embase, PubMed, CNKI, and Web of Science before July 1, 2014. STATA 12.0 software was used for calculation and statistical analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (PLR, NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were used to assess the diagnostic performance of miR-21 for cancers. Seventy-three studies in 60 articles were involved in this meta-analysis, with a total of 4684 patients with cancer and 3108 controls. The overall parameters were calculated from all the included studies: sensitivity of 0.78 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-0.81), specificity of 0.83 (95% CI 0.80-0.86), PLR of 4.5 (95% CI 3.8-5.4), NLR of 0.27 (95% CI 0.23-0.32); DOR of 17 (95% CI 12-23), and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.90). In addition, we performed subgroup analyses based on ethnicity, cancer types, and sample types. Results from subgroup analysis showed that cancer types and sample types were the sources of heterogeneity in our meta-analysis. The overall diagnostic value of miR-21 is not very high for cancer diagnosis; however, it is affected significantly by the types of cancer and specimen. MiR-21 has a relatively high diagnostic value for detecting breast cancer, and miR-21 assays based on plasma, serum, and tissue achieved relatively higher accuracy.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesChildFemaleHumansMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedNeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsMIRN21 microRNA, human

Identifiers

PMID25431259
OpenAlexW1981508242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.