Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25431127›Full record

Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2015

A phase II study of sulforaphane-rich broccoli sprout extracts in men with recurrent prostate cancer.

Joshi J Alumkal, Rachel Slottke, Jacob Schwartzman, Ganesh Cherala, Myrna Munar, Julie N Graff, Tomasz M Beer, Christopher W Ryan, Dennis R Koop, Angela Gibbs and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 218 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joshi J AlumkalOHSU Knight Cancer Institute Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), 3303 SW Bond Avenue, Portland, OR, 97239, USA, alumkalj@ohsu.edu.
Rachel Slottke
Jacob Schwartzman
Ganesh Cherala
Myrna Munar
Julie N Graff
Tomasz M Beer
Christopher W Ryan
Dennis R Koop
Angela Gibbs
Lina Gao
Jason F Flamiatos
Erin Tucker
Richard Kleinschmidt
Motomi Mori
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Understanding the origins of rapid recurrence of pancreatic cancer after resectionP30CA069533 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Luiz Eduardo Bertassoni · 1997 to 2026
$60.5M
Oregon Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUL1TR000128 · NCATS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ELLISON, DAVID H · 2012 to 2015
$28.7M
Oregon Clinical and Translational Research InstituteKL2TR000152 · NCATS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ELLISON, DAVID H · 2012 to 2015
$1.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000152NCATS NIH HHS KL2TR000152NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000128NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000128NCI NIH HHS P30 CA069533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDiets high in cruciferous vegetables are associated with lower risk of incidence of prostate cancer, including aggressive forms of this disease. Human intervention studies with cruciferous vegetable-rich diets also demonstrate modulation of gene expression in important pathways in prostate cells. PURPOSE: Sulforaphane is a constituent of these foods postulated to harbor the anti-neoplastic activity based on multiple tumor models. Our own work demonstrates that sulforaphane inhibits AR signaling in prostate cancer cells. Here, we report results from the first clinical trial of sulforaphane-rich extracts in men with prostate cancer.

methodsWe treated 20 patients who had recurrent prostate cancer with 200 μmoles/day of sulforaphane-rich extracts for a maximum period of 20 weeks and determined the proportion of patients with ≥50% PSA declines, the primary endpoint. Only one subject experienced a ≥50% PSA decline. Thus, the primary endpoint was not achieved. Seven patients experienced smaller PSA declines (<50%). There was also a significant lengthening of the on-treatment PSA doubling time (PSADT) compared with the pre-treatment PSADT [6.1 months pre-treatment vs. 9.6 months on-treatment (p = 0.044)]. Finally, treatment with sulforaphane-rich extracts was safe with no Grade 3 adverse events.

conclusionsTreatment with 200 μmoles/day of sulforaphane-rich extracts did not lead to ≥50% PSA declines in the majority of patients. However, because of the safety of treatment and the effects on PSADT modulation, further studies, including those with higher doses, may be warranted to clarify the role of sulforaphane as a prevention agent or treatment agent.

Indexed as

BrassicaArea Under CurveChromatography, LiquidDose-Response Relationship, DrugGlutathione TransferaseHalf-LifeHumansIsothiocyanatesMaleMetabolic Clearance RateNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPlant ExtractsProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsSulfoxidesTandem Mass SpectrometryGlutathione TransferaseIsothiocyanatesPlant ExtractsProstate-Specific AntigensulforaphaneSulfoxides

Identifiers

PMID25431127
PMCPMC4390425
OpenAlexW2090764585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.