Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25430992›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2014

Refractory chronic cluster headache: a consensus statement on clinical definition from the European Headache Federation.

Dimos D Mitsikostas, Lars Edvinsson, Rigmor H Jensen, Zaza Katsarava, Christian Lampl, Andrea Negro, Vera Osipova, Koen Paemeleire, Aksel Siva, Dominique Valade and 1 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Resonance massage tool effects in non-migraine headache management.Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2025
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Hallmarks of primary headache: part 3 - cluster headache.The journal of headache and pain · 2025
    Review
  15. 15. Cluster Headache.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. The profile of refractory chronic cluster headache.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Health equity, care access and quality in headache - part 2.The journal of headache and pain · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Dimos D MitsikostasAthens Naval Hospital, Neurology Department, 77A Vas, Sofias Avenue, 11521 Athens, Greece. dimosmitsikostas@me.com.
Lars Edvinsson
Rigmor H Jensen
Zaza Katsarava
Christian Lampl
Andrea Negro
Vera Osipova
Koen Paemeleire
Aksel Siva
Dominique Valade
Paolo Martelletti

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic cluster headache (CCH) often resists to prophylactic pharmaceutical treatments resulting in patients' life damage. In this rare but pragmatic situation escalation to invasive management is needed but framing criteria are lacking. We aimed to reach a consensus for refractory CCH definition for clinical and research use. The preparation of the final consensus followed three stages. Internal between authors, a larger between all European Headache Federation members and finally an international one among all investigators that have published clinical studies on cluster headache the last five years. Eighty-five investigators reached by email. Proposed criteria were in the format of the International Classification of Headache Disorders III-beta (description, criteria, notes, comments and references). Following this evaluation eight drafts were prepared before the final. Twenty-four (28.2%) international investigators commented during two rounds. Refractory CCH is described in the present consensus as a situation that fulfills the criteria of ICHD-3 beta for CCH with at least three severe attacks per week despite at least three consecutive trials of adequate preventive treatments. The condition is rare, but difficult to manage and invasive treatments may be needed. The consensus addresses five specific clinical and paraclinical diagnostic criteria followed by three notes and specific comments. Although refractory CCH may be not a separate identity these specific diagnostic criteria should help clinicians and investigators to improve patient's quality of life.

Indexed as

ConsensusCluster HeadacheEuropeHumansSocieties, Medical

Identifiers

PMID25430992
PMCPMC4256964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.