Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25430665›Full record

ArticleDer Anaesthesist2014

[Standardized telephone-assisted instructions on resuscitation by laypersons. Feasibility study using video-assisted quality analysis].

J C Nest, D Steinbrunner, M Karger, M Hiltl, F von Kaufmann, K-G Kanz, U Kreimeier

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J C NestKlinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum der Universität München (LMU), Campus Innenstadt, Nussbaumstr. 20, 80336, München, Deutschland, jnest@med.lmu.de.
D Steinbrunner
M Karger
M Hiltl
F von Kaufmann
K-G Kanz
U Kreimeier
Feuerwehr Dortmund · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DELMU Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelephone-assisted instructions for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR) are highly recommended by the current European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines for resuscitation 2010.

aimThe aim of this study was to analyze the adherence of laypersons to T-CPR instructions given by dispatchers in a mock scenario. The dispatchers adapted international T-CPR instructions to local requirements. MATERIAL AND

methodsAn emergency "collapse in the office" with subsequent T-CPR was simulated for 10 volunteer, untrained administrative staff, as the only single emergency witness and 4 emergency medical service (EMS) dispatchers. Each volunteer was sent to a "colleague" who simulated a sudden cardiovascular event and collapsed unconscious during the description of symptoms. The local lay responder made an emergency call by landline telephone and was connected to the dispatcher. In the course of the simulation the "victim" was replaced by a CPR manikin.

resultsEvery participant, i.e. 10 out of 10, assessed the victim, recognized the situation and telephoned for help. On the orders of the dispatchers 9 out of the 10 activated the loudspeaker of the telephone but 4 still continued to use the handset. The instructions for positioning were followed by all 10. Correct positioning of the victim required a median of 33[Symbol: see text]s with an interquartile range (IQR) of 30-39[Symbol: see text]s. Breathing control including instructions lasted a median of 54[Symbol: see text]s (IQR 49-60[Symbol: see text]s). Breathing was assessed by 8 out of 10 but only 2 out of 8 achieved a duration of 10[Symbol: see text]s as recommended by the ERC guidelines for resuscitation 2010. After a median of 202[Symbol: see text]s (IQR 196-241[Symbol: see text]s) chest compressions were started by 9 out of 10 and were performed for a median of 63[Symbol: see text]s (IQR 60-69[Symbol: see text]s). A correct technique was used by 7 but with a low rate of 80 compressions/min (IQR 72-86/min). The instructions for ventilation were understood by 9 out of 10. Mouth-to-mouth resuscitation was performed by 7 participants and technically correct by 5 of them. The ventilation cycle of the 7 active participants lasted for a mean of 25[Symbol: see text]s (IQR 24-30[Symbol: see text]s). The mean total duration of the timeframe analyzed was 340[Symbol: see text]s (IQR 334-368[Symbol: see text]s).

conclusionThe results demonstrate that the local T-CPR concept for untrained laypersons is feasible in a mock scenario. No substantial errors were observed for the majority of the untrained responders but the simulation also showed that not every emergency witness implemented the instructions according to the dispatcher's expectations. The T-CPR procedure was also more time-consuming than expected; therefore, every standardized T-CPR concept should be tested for local practicability. In accordance with current studies, the results suggest that the focus should be on compression-only CPR instructions in urban settings. Dispatcher education in T-CPR should incorporate videotaped mock-up scenarios with untrained local laypersons.

Indexed as

TelephoneCardiopulmonary ResuscitationEmergency Medical ServicesFeasibility StudiesGermanyHumansManikinsVolunteers

Identifiers

PMID25430665
OpenAlexW166769916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.