Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25430629›Full record

ReviewBMC infectious diseases2014

How to avoid microaspiration? A key element for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in intubated ICU patients.

Stijn I Blot, Jan Poelaert, Marin Kollef

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC infectious diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06848010 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

TRacheal Cuff PRessure Evaluation Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorPoliclinico HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled54ConditionsPneumonia, Ventilator-Associated, Mechanical VentilationArmsAutomated endotracheal cuff controller
NCT07017205 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Automated Versus Manual Cuff Pressure Control for Preventing Microaspiration With TaperGuard Endotracheal Tubes in Elective Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorArgentinian Intensive Care SocietyRan2026 to 2026Enrolled72ConditionsEndotracheal Tube Cuff, Microaspiration, Endotracheal Tube Cuff PressureArmsApplication of oropharyngeal dye and tracheal aspirate collection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Stijn I BlotDept, of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. stijn.blot@UGent.be.
Jan Poelaert
Marin Kollef
Ghent University · BEWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microaspiration of subglottic secretions through channels formed by folds in high volume-low pressure poly-vinyl chloride cuffs of endotracheal tubes is considered a significant pathogenic mechanism of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Therefore a series of prevention measures target the avoidance of microaspiration. However, although some of these can minimize microaspiration, benefits in terms of VAP prevention are not always obvious. Polyurethane-cuffed endotracheal tubes successfully reduce microaspiration but high quality data demonstrating VAP rate reduction are lacking. An analogous conclusion can be made regarding taper-shaped cuffs compared with classic barrel-shaped cuffs. More clinical data regarding these endotracheal tube designs are needed to demonstrate clinical value in addition to in vitro-based evidence. The clinical usefulness of endotracheal tubes developed for subglottic secretions drainage is established in multiple studies and confirmed by meta-analysis. Any change in cuff design will fail to prevent microaspiration if the cuff is insufficiently inflated. At least one well-designed trial demonstrated that continuous cuff pressure monitoring and control decrease the risk of VAP. Gel lubrication of the cuff prior to intubation temporarily hampers microaspiration through sludging the channels formed by folds in high volume-low pressure cuffs. As the beneficial effect of gel lubrication is temporarily, its potential to reduce VAP risk is probably nonsignificant. A minimum positive end-expiratory pressure of at least 5 cmH2O can be recommended as it reduces the risk of microaspiration in vitro and in vivo. One randomized controlled study demonstrated a reduced risk of VAP in patients ventilated with PEEP (5-8 cmH2O). Regarding head-of-bed elevation, it can be recommended to avoid supine positioning. Whether a 45° head-of-bed elevation is to be preferred above 25-30° head-of-bed elevation remains unproven. Finally, the routine monitoring of gastric residual volumes in mechanically ventilated patients receiving enteral nutrition cannot be recommended.

Indexed as

Critical CareCross InfectionHumansIntensive Care UnitsIntubation, IntratrachealPneumonia, AspirationPneumonia, BacterialPneumonia, Ventilator-Associated

Identifiers

PMID25430629
PMCPMC4289393
OpenAlexW2013309498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.