ArticleAnatolian journal of cardiology2015
Wall motion changes in myocardial infarction in relation to the time elapsed from symptoms until revascularization.
Article in Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac point-of-care ultrasound detection of regional wall motion abnormalities optimizes clinical assessment in patients with acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of Total Ischemic Time on the Recovery of Regional Wall Motion Abnormality after STEMI in the Modern Reperfusion Era.Journal of interventional cardiology · 2022Article
- Searching for the key to improve infarcted cardiac wall motion and prevent ventricular remodeling after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Beyond symptom-onset-to-balloon time.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2015Article
- Utility of Handheld Ultrasound Performed by Cardiology Fellows in Patients Presenting with Suspected ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Journal of cardiovascular echographyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWall motion abnormalities during acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and the improvement after recanalization depend on the conditions of the coronary occlusion.
methodsFifty-seven patients with first-ever STEMI due to one-artery occlusion, treated with primary PCI, were evaluated. Area at risk and left ventricular wall motion abnormalities were localized with coronary angiography and echocardiography and then compared in relation to the time elapsed from the onset of symptoms at the time of infarction and at 3 months. Left ventricular diameters and ejection fractions were evaluated in relation to the ischemic time.
resultsThree hundred forty-one affected left ventricular segments were detected with angiography, while echocardiography showed 206 segments with motion abnormality. No correlation was found between the regional wall motion index in the area at risk and the time elapsed from the beginning of symptoms. However, the improvement in wall motion abnormalities at the follow-up was dependent on the ischemic time (r=-0.29, p<0.03). The early subgroup showed significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction at follow-up (p=0.03), whereas in the late subgroup, a significant increase in left ventricle diameters was observed.
conclusionOur results first demonstrate in humans that in the early hours from the occlusion of the coronary artery, the extent and severity of the wall motion abnormalities inside the area at risk show large variability without relation to the elapsed time since the onset of symptoms. On the other hand, the results of follow-up echocardiography proved that the wall motion improvement was highly dependent on the ischemic time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.