Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25429822›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2015

Evaluating quality of life and response shift from a couple-based perspective: a study among patients with colorectal cancer and their partners.

Marjan J Traa, Johan Braeken, Jolanda De Vries, Jan A Roukema, Ricardo G Orsini, Brenda L Den Oudsten

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Spouses of patients treated for colon cancer: identification of key caregiver skills using the Delphi method.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Informal caregiver well-being during and after patients' treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer: a prospective, exploratory study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marjan J TraaCoRPS - Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Johan Braeken
Jolanda De Vries
Jan A Roukema
Ricardo G Orsini
Brenda L Den Oudsten

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine (1) measurement invariance of quality of life (QoL) domains over time for patients with colorectal cancer and partners (i.e., response shift--recalibration, reprioritization, and reconceptualization), (2) between dyad-member measurement invariance and (3) QoL trajectories.

methodsParticipants completed the WHOQOL-Bref preoperative (Time-0) and 3 (Time-1) and 6 months (Time-2) postoperative. A stepwise procedure, using nested factor models, examined the viability of restricting specific model parameters to be equal across measurements and between dyad members.

findingsNo reconceptualization and reprioritization was detected, but indications for recalibration were present. Therefore, comparisons were restricted to group-level statistics at factor level. For patients, a decrease in the Physical Health domain occurred at Time-1 (p < 0.001), with partial recovery to baseline at Time-2 (p = 0.055). For partners, factor means in this domain remained constant (p's > 0.05) and were at each time point higher than patients' factor means (p's < 0.05). Patients' and partners' Psychological Health decreased at Time-1 (p's < 0.05), with stabilization at Time-2 (p's > 0.05). Patients and partners' factor means were comparable (p's > 0.05). Patients and partners' Social Relationship factor means decreased at Time-1 (p's < 0.05), which decreased further for patients (p = 0.011) but stabilized for partners (p = 0.214). Partners' factor means were only lower than patients' factor means at Time-1. A similar decrease in the Environmental domain factor means occurred for both patients and partners at Time-1 (p's < 0.05), with stabilization at Time-2 (p's > 0.05).

conclusionSince both patients and partners are affected by the patients' disease and treatment, we recommend that attention is paid to the couple instead of solely the patient.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAgedColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedNetherlandsSexual PartnersSpousesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.