ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2015
Evaluating quality of life and response shift from a couple-based perspective: a study among patients with colorectal cancer and their partners.
Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Role of Response-Shift in Studies Assessing Quality of Life Outcomes Among Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Pooled it
- Four clinical dilemmas in surgical decision making for low rectal cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- The Illness Perceptions and Coping Experiences of Patients with Colorectal Cancer and Their Spousal Caregivers: A Qualitative Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Spouses of patients treated for colon cancer: identification of key caregiver skills using the Delphi method.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- The development and evaluation of a web-based complex intervention: The caring for couples coping with colorectal cancer "4Cs: CRC" program.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2022Article
- Quality of life after colorectal surgery: A prospective study of patients compared with their spouses.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021Article
- Informal caregiver well-being during and after patients' treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer: a prospective, exploratory study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Article
- A feasibility study of an integrated couples-based supportive programme for Chinese couples living with colorectal cancer.Nursing open · 2021Article
- Response shift in health-related quality of life measures in the presence of formative indicators.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo examine (1) measurement invariance of quality of life (QoL) domains over time for patients with colorectal cancer and partners (i.e., response shift--recalibration, reprioritization, and reconceptualization), (2) between dyad-member measurement invariance and (3) QoL trajectories.
methodsParticipants completed the WHOQOL-Bref preoperative (Time-0) and 3 (Time-1) and 6 months (Time-2) postoperative. A stepwise procedure, using nested factor models, examined the viability of restricting specific model parameters to be equal across measurements and between dyad members.
findingsNo reconceptualization and reprioritization was detected, but indications for recalibration were present. Therefore, comparisons were restricted to group-level statistics at factor level. For patients, a decrease in the Physical Health domain occurred at Time-1 (p < 0.001), with partial recovery to baseline at Time-2 (p = 0.055). For partners, factor means in this domain remained constant (p's > 0.05) and were at each time point higher than patients' factor means (p's < 0.05). Patients' and partners' Psychological Health decreased at Time-1 (p's < 0.05), with stabilization at Time-2 (p's > 0.05). Patients and partners' factor means were comparable (p's > 0.05). Patients and partners' Social Relationship factor means decreased at Time-1 (p's < 0.05), which decreased further for patients (p = 0.011) but stabilized for partners (p = 0.214). Partners' factor means were only lower than patients' factor means at Time-1. A similar decrease in the Environmental domain factor means occurred for both patients and partners at Time-1 (p's < 0.05), with stabilization at Time-2 (p's > 0.05).
conclusionSince both patients and partners are affected by the patients' disease and treatment, we recommend that attention is paid to the couple instead of solely the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25429822What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.