Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25429616›Full record

ArticleCell death & disease2014

Modulation of A1 and A2B adenosine receptor activity: a new strategy to sensitise glioblastoma stem cells to chemotherapy.

S Daniele, E Zappelli, L Natali, C Martini, M L Trincavelli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death & disease, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Purinergic system in cancer stem cells.Purinergic signalling · 2025
    Review
  4. Adenosinergic Signalling in Cervical Cancer Microenvironment.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Immunotherapy for glioblastoma: the promise of combination strategies.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2022
    Review
  13. Emerging roles of purinergic signaling in anti-cancer therapy resistance.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Glial ACells · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S DanieleDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
E ZappelliDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
L NataliDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
C MartiniDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
M L TrincavelliDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
University of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapies that target the signal transduction and biological characteristics of cancer stem cells (CSCs) are innovative strategies that are used in combination with conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy to effectively reduce the recurrence and significantly improve the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). The two main strategies that are currently being exploited to eradicate CSCs are (a) chemotherapeutic regimens that specifically drive CSCs toward cell death and (b) those that promote the differentiation of CSCs, thereby depleting the tumour reservoir. Extracellular purines, particularly adenosine triphosphate, have been implicated in the regulation of CSC formation, but currently, no data on the role of adenosine and its receptors in the biological processes of CSCs are available. In this study, we investigated the role of adenosine receptor (AR) subtypes in the survival and differentiation of CSCs isolated from human GBM cells. Stimulation of A1AR and A2BAR had a prominent anti-proliferative/pro-apoptotic effect on the CSCs. Notably, an A1AR agonist also promoted the differentiation of CSCs toward a glial phenotype. The differential effects of the two AR agonists on the survival and/or differentiation of CSCs may be ascribed to their distinct regulation of the kinetics of ERK/AKT phosphorylation and the expression of hypoxia-inducible factors. Most importantly, the AR agonists sensitised CSCs to the genotoxic activity of temozolomide (TMZ) and prolonged its effects, most likely through different mechanisms, are as follows: (i) by A2BAR potentiating the pro-apoptotic effects of TMZ and (ii) by A1AR driving cells toward a differentiated phenotype that is more sensitive to TMZ. Taken together, the results of this study suggested that the purinergic system is a novel target for a stem cell-oriented therapy that could reduce the recurrence of GBM and improve the survival rate of GBM patients.

Indexed as

Adenosine A1 Receptor AgonistsAdenosine A2 Receptor AgonistsApoptosisBrain NeoplasmsCell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SeparationCell ShapeCell SurvivalDacarbazineGlioblastomaHumansLigandsNeoplastic Stem CellsReceptor, Adenosine A1Adenosine A1 Receptor AgonistsAdenosine A2 Receptor AgonistsDacarbazineLigandsReceptor, Adenosine A1Receptor, Adenosine A2BTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID25429616
PMCPMC4260745
OpenAlexW1992868626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.