Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25429605›Full record

ArticleNature communications2014

Evolution of dominance mechanisms at a butterfly mimicry supergene.

Yann Le Poul, Annabel Whibley, Mathieu Chouteau, Florence Prunier, Violaine Llaurens, Mathieu Joron

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Radiation and hybridization underpin the spread of the fire ant social supergene.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  16. Association mapping of colour variation in a butterfly provides evidence that a supergene locks together a cluster of adaptive loci.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. The integrative biology of genetic dominance.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yann Le PoulCNRS UMR 7205, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CP50, 45 rue Buffon, Paris 75005, France.
Annabel WhibleyCNRS UMR 7205, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CP50, 45 rue Buffon, Paris 75005, France.
Mathieu ChouteauCNRS UMR 7205, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CP50, 45 rue Buffon, Paris 75005, France.
Florence PrunierCNRS UMR 7205, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CP50, 45 rue Buffon, Paris 75005, France.
Violaine LlaurensCNRS UMR 7205, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CP50, 45 rue Buffon, Paris 75005, France.
Mathieu JoronCNRS UMR 7205, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CP50, 45 rue Buffon, Paris 75005, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic dominance in polymorphic loci may respond to selection; however, the evolution of dominance in complex traits remains a puzzle. We analyse dominance at a wing-patterning supergene controlling local mimicry polymorphism in the butterfly Heliconius numata. Supergene alleles are associated with chromosomal inversion polymorphism, defining ancestral versus derived alleles. Using controlled crosses and the new procedure, Colour Pattern Modelling, allowing whole-wing pattern comparisons, we estimate dominance coefficients between alleles. Here we show strict dominance in sympatry favouring mimicry and inconsistent dominance throughout the wing between alleles from distant populations. Furthermore, dominance among derived alleles is uncoordinated across wing-pattern elements, producing mosaic heterozygous patterns determined by a hierarchy in colour expression. By contrast, heterozygotes with an ancestral allele show complete, coordinated dominance of the derived allele, independently of colours. Therefore, distinct dominance mechanisms have evolved in association with supergene inversions, in response to strong selection on mimicry polymorphism.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenes, InsectPolymorphism, GeneticAllelesAnimalsButterfliesGenes, DominantPhenotypePigmentationWings, Animal

Identifiers

PMID25429605
PMCPMC4263167
OpenAlexW2028323110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.