Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25429289›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2014

The Single Intradermal Cervical Comparative Test Interferes with Johne's Disease ELISA Diagnostics.

Aideen E Kennedy, Ana T Da Silva, Noel Byrne, Rodney Govender, John MacSharry, Jim O'Mahony, Riona G Sayers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The Occurrence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aideen E KennedyAnimal and Bioscience Research Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc , Cork , Ireland ; Department of Biological Sciences, Cork Institute of Technology , Cork , Ireland.
Ana T Da SilvaAnimal and Bioscience Research Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc , Cork , Ireland.
Noel ByrneAnimal and Bioscience Research Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc , Cork , Ireland.
Rodney GovenderDepartment of Biological Sciences, Cork Institute of Technology , Cork , Ireland.
John MacSharryAlimentary Pharmabiotic Centre, Biosciences Institute, University College Cork , Cork , Ireland.
Jim O'MahonyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Cork Institute of Technology , Cork , Ireland.
Riona G SayersAnimal and Bioscience Research Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc , Cork , Ireland.
Munster Technological University · IETeagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IEUniversity College Cork · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) of milk and serum samples are a routinely used method of screening herds for Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP). Infection with MAP causes granulomatous enteritis of ruminants known as Johne's disease (JD). The sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of MAP ELISAs leads to difficulties in the identification of both infected and infectious animals. Interference with MAP ELISA Se and Sp has been reported in MAP seronegative cows following administration of purified protein derivative (PPD) as part of intradermal testing for bovine tuberculosis (bTB). The aim of this study is to examine the impact of the single intradermal cervical comparative test (SICCT) for bTB, on both serum and milk MAP ELISA tests, in a herd containing both seropositive and seronegative cows pre-SICCT. A secondary objective is to provide appropriate timing of JD ELISA tests in relation to the SICCT. A herd of 139 cows were serum and milk sampled pre- and post-SICCT administration. Prior to SICCT, 6% of the herd tested seropositive for MAP using milk ELISA, with 8% positive on serum. ID Screen Paratuberculosis Indirect Screening Test (ID Vet) was used to screen the herd. Within 14 days of PPD administration, a significant increase in the prevalence of seropositive cows was recorded. Identical prevalence's were recorded with both test matrices (39%). ELISA values remained significantly higher until day 43 post-SICCT in milk (P = 0.850), and day 71 in serum (P = 0.602). If the "new" positives detected post-bTB testing are deemed false positives due to generation of cross-reacting antibodies by administration of PPD, milk would appear a more suitable sample for JD ELISA testing within 2 months of SICCT. In summary, sampling for JD utilizing milk ELISA should be avoided in the 43-day period following PPD administration, with serum ELISA sampling avoided for an additional 28 days.

Indexed as

ELISAJohne’s diseaseMycobacteriaceaPPDTB test

Identifiers

PMID25429289
PMCPMC4228858
OpenAlexW2163745059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.