ArticleFrontiers in psychology2014
Quantifying long-range correlations and 1/f patterns in a minimal experiment of social interaction.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- An open-source perceptual crossing device for investigating brain dynamics during human interaction.PloS one · 2024Article
- A Minimal Turing Test: Reciprocal Sensorimotor Contingencies for Interaction Detection.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Sensitivity to Social Contingency in Adults with High-Functioning Autism during Computer-Mediated Embodied Interaction.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Long-Range Correlation Underlying Childhood Language and Generative Models.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Multi-Scale Coordination of Distinctive Movement Patterns During Embodied Interaction Between Adults With High-Functioning Autism and Neurotypicals.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- The Stance Leads the Dance: The Emergence of Role in a Joint Supra-Postural Task.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Article
- What does the interactive brain hypothesis mean for social neuroscience? A dialogue.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016Article
- Multi-scale interactions in interpersonal coordination.Journal of sport and health science · 2016Article
- Time-Series Analysis of Embodied Interaction: Movement Variability and Complexity Matching As Dyadic Properties.Frontiers in psychology · 2016Article
- Your body, my body, our coupling moves our bodies.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, researchers in social cognition have found the "perceptual crossing paradigm" to be both a theoretical and practical advance toward meeting particular challenges. This paradigm has been used to analyze the type of interactive processes that emerge in minimal interactions and it has allowed progress toward understanding of the principles of social cognition processes. In this paper, we analyze whether some critical aspects of these interactions could not have been observed by previous studies. We consider alternative indicators that could complete, or even lead us to rethink, the current interpretation of the results obtained from both experimental and simulated modeling in the fields of social interactions and minimal perceptual crossing. In particular, we discuss the possibility that previous experiments have been analytically constrained to a short-term dynamic type of player response. Additionally, we propose the possibility of considering these experiments from a more suitable framework based on the use and analysis of long-range correlations and fractal dynamics. We will also reveal evidence supporting the idea that social interactions are deployed along many scales of activity. Specifically, we propose that the fractal structure of the interactions could be a more adequate framework to understand the type of social interaction patterns generated in a social engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.