Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25429260›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroanatomy2014

All brains are made of this: a fundamental building block of brain matter with matching neuronal and glial masses.

Bruno Mota, Suzana Herculano-Houzel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cellular Composition of the Brain of a Northern Minke Whale.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Regressive changes in sizes of somatosensory cuneate nucleus after sensory loss in primates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Microglial Density Alters Measures of Axonal Integrity and Structural Connectivity.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2020
    Article
  14. Similar Microglial Cell Densities across Brain Structures and Mammalian Species: Implications for Brain Tissue Function.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evaluating the gray and white matter energy budgets of human brain function.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bruno MotaInstituto de Física, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil ; Instituto Nacional de Neurociência Translacional São Paulo, Brazil.
Suzana Herculano-HouzelInstituto Nacional de Neurociência Translacional São Paulo, Brazil ; Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia de Neurociência Translacional · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How does the size of the glial and neuronal cells that compose brain tissue vary across brain structures and species? Our previous studies indicate that average neuronal size is highly variable, while average glial cell size is more constant. Measuring whole cell sizes in vivo, however, is a daunting task. Here we use chi-square minimization of the relationship between measured neuronal and glial cell densities in the cerebral cortex, cerebellum, and rest of brain in 27 mammalian species to model neuronal and glial cell mass, as well as the neuronal mass fraction of the tissue (the fraction of tissue mass composed by neurons). Our model shows that while average neuronal cell mass varies by over 500-fold across brain structures and species, average glial cell mass varies only 1.4-fold. Neuronal mass fraction varies typically between 0.6 and 0.8 in all structures. Remarkably, we show that two fundamental, universal relationships apply across all brain structures and species: (1) the glia/neuron ratio varies with the total neuronal mass in the tissue (which in turn depends on variations in average neuronal cell mass), and (2) the neuronal mass per glial cell, and with it the neuronal mass fraction and neuron/glia mass ratio, varies with average glial cell mass in the tissue. We propose that there is a fundamental building block of brain tissue: the glial mass that accompanies a unit of neuronal mass. We argue that the scaling of this glial mass is a consequence of a universal mechanism whereby numbers of glial cells are added to the neuronal parenchyma during development, irrespective of whether the neurons composing it are large or small, but depending on the average mass of the glial cells being added. We also show how evolutionary variations in neuronal cell mass, glial cell mass and number of neurons suffice to determine the most basic characteristics of brain structures, such as mass, glia/neuron ratio, neuron/glia mass ratio, and cell densities.

Indexed as

allometrybrain sizecell sizeglia/neuron rationumber of glial cellsnumber of neurons

Identifiers

PMID25429260
PMCPMC4228857
OpenAlexW2113483210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.