Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25429250›Full record

ArticleProteome science2014

Unravelling associations between unassigned mass spectrometry peaks with frequent itemset mining techniques.

Trung Nghia Vu, Aida Mrzic, Dirk Valkenborg, Evelyne Maes, Filip Lemière, Bart Goethals, Kris Laukens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteome science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Microbial Metabolites Annotation by Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Trung Nghia VuDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium ; Biomedical Informatics Research Center Antwerp (biomina), University of Antwerp / Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Aida MrzicDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium ; Biomedical Informatics Research Center Antwerp (biomina), University of Antwerp / Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Dirk ValkenborgApplied Bio & molecular Systems, VITO, Mol, Belgium ; Center for Proteomics, Antwerp, Belgium ; Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Evelyne MaesApplied Bio & molecular Systems, VITO, Mol, Belgium ; Center for Proteomics, Antwerp, Belgium ; KU Leuven, Functional Genomics and Proteomics lab, Leuven, Belgium.
Filip LemièreDepartment of Chemistry, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Bart GoethalsDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Kris LaukensDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium ; Biomedical Informatics Research Center Antwerp (biomina), University of Antwerp / Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMass spectrometry-based proteomics experiments generate spectra that are rich in information. Often only a fraction of this information is used for peptide/protein identification, whereas a significant proportion of the peaks in a spectrum remain unexplained. In this paper we explore how a specific class of data mining techniques termed "frequent itemset mining" can be employed to discover patterns in the unassigned data, and how such patterns can help us interpret the origin of the unexpected/unexplained peaks.

resultsFirst a model is proposed that describes the origin of the observed peaks in a mass spectrum. For this purpose we use the classical correlative database search algorithm. Peaks that support a positive identification of the spectrum are termed explained peaks. Next, frequent itemset mining techniques are introduced to infer which unexplained peaks are associated in a spectrum. The method is validated on two types of experimental proteomic data. First, peptide mass fingerprint data is analyzed to explain the unassigned peaks in a full scan mass spectrum. Interestingly, a large numbers of experimental spectra reveals several highly frequent unexplained masses, and pattern mining on these frequent masses demonstrates that subsets of these peaks frequently co-occur. Further evaluation shows that several of these co-occurring peaks indeed have a known common origin, and other patterns are promising hypothesis generators for further analysis. Second, the proposed methodology is validated on tandem mass spectrometral data using a public spectral library, where associations within the mass differences of unassigned peaks and peptide modifications are explored. The investigation of the found patterns illustrates that meaningful patterns can be discovered that can be explained by features of the employed technology and found modifications.

conclusionsThis simple approach offers opportunities to monitor accumulating unexplained mass spectrometry data for emerging new patterns, with possible applications for the development of mass exclusion lists, for the refinement of quality control strategies and for a further interpretation of unexplained spectral peaks in mass spectrometry and tandem mass spectrometry.

Indexed as

Aberrant peaksFrequent itemset miningPattern miningUnassigned masses

Identifiers

PMID25429250
PMCPMC4243190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.