ArticleScience signaling2014
Targeting cell-intrinsic and cell-extrinsic mechanisms of intravasation in invasive breast cancer.
Article in Science signaling, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Updating the therapeutic role of ginsenosides in breast cancer: a bibliometrics study to an in-depth review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- AKT-ions with a TWIST between EMT and MET.Oncotarget · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The survival of breast cancer patients with metastatic disease has not markedly improved over recent decades, highlighting the need to better understand this process. In this issue of Science Signaling, Pignatelli et al. used freshly obtained invasive ductal carcinoma cells from patients to demonstrate the need for high abundance of the invasive isoform of the Mena protein (Mena(INV)) in cancer cells and colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1)-mediated paracrine signaling in macrophages for efficient transendothelial migration and metastasis formation in all clinical breast cancer subtypes. Furthermore, the triple negative and HER2(+) subtypes, but not the ERPR(+)/HER2(-) subtype, had high CSF-1 receptor (CSF-1R) abundance and also partially used autocrine CSF-1/CSF-1R signaling for invasion. These data establish Mena(INV), CSF-1/CSF-1R, and macrophages as potential therapeutic targets for most human breast cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.