Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25428953›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2014

Remote ischemic preconditioning of cardiomyocytes inhibits the mitochondrial permeability transition pore independently of reduced calcium-loading or sarcKATP channel activation.

Helen E Turrell, Chokanan Thaitirarot, Hayley Crumbie, Glenn Rodrigo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. No influence of ischemic preconditioning on running economy.European journal of applied physiology · 2017
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Citric Acid Cycle Metabolites Predict Infarct Size inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Helen E TurrellDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Glenfield General Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Chokanan ThaitirarotDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Glenfield General Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Hayley CrumbieDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Glenfield General Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Glenn RodrigoDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Glenfield General Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Glenfield Hospital · GBUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/08/097/26073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) inhibits Ca(2+)-loading during ischemia which contributes to cardioprotection by inhibiting mechanical injury due to hypercontracture and biochemical injury through mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT) pores during reperfusion. However, whether remote-IPC reduced Ca(2+)-loading during ischemia and its subsequent involvement in inhibiting MPT pore formation during reperfusion has not been directly shown. We have developed a cellular model of remote IPC to look at the impact of remote conditioning on Ca(2+)-regulation and MPT pore opening during simulated ischemia and reperfusion, using fluorescence microscopy. Ventricular cardiomyocytes were isolated from control rat hearts, hearts preconditioned with three cycles of ischemia/reperfusion or naïve myocytes remotely conditioned with effluent collected from preconditioned hearts. Both conventional-IPC and remote-IPC reduced the loss of Ca(2+)-homeostasis and contractile function following reenergization of metabolically inhibited cells and protected myocytes against ischemia/reperfusion injury. However, only conventional-IPC reduced the Ca(2+)-loading during metabolic inhibition and this was independent of any change in sarcKATP channel activity but was associated with a reduction in Na(+)-loading, reflecting a decrease in Na/H exchanger activity. Remote-IPC delayed opening of the MPT pores in response to ROS, which was dependent on PKCε and NOS-signaling. These data show that remote-IPC inhibits MPT pore opening to a similar degree as conventional IPC, however, the contribution of MPT pore inhibition to protection against reperfusion injury is independent of Ca(2+)-loading in remote IPC. We suggest that inhibition of the MPT pore and not Ca(2+)-loading is the common link in cardioprotection between conventional and remote IPC.

Indexed as

Ca2+‐Loadingischemic preconditioningMPT poreremote ischemic preconditioningsodium/hydrogen exchanger

Identifiers

PMID25428953
PMCPMC4255825
OpenAlexW2126172083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.