Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25428939›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR2014

Internal sense of direction: sensing and signaling from cytoplasmic chemoreceptors.

Kieran D Collins, Jesus Lacal, Karen M Ottemann

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. TheJournal of bacteriology · 2026
    Article
  2. Structure and signaling mechanism ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Only Chemoreceptor Encoded byMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Diversity of bacterial chemosensory systems.Current opinion in microbiology · 2021
    Review
  17. Evidence for Pentapeptide-Dependent and Independent CheB Methylesterases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kieran D CollinsDepartment of Microbiology and Environmental Toxicology, UC Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, USA.
Jesus LacalSection of Cell and Developmental Biology, Division of Biological Sciences, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Karen M OttemannDepartment of Microbiology and Environmental Toxicology, UC Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, USA Ottemann@ucsc.edu.
University of California, Santa Cruz · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryChemoreceptors sense environmental signals and drive chemotactic responses in Bacteria and Archaea. There are two main classes of chemoreceptors: integral inner membrane and soluble cytoplasmic proteins. The latter were identified more recently than integral membrane chemoreceptors and have been studied much less thoroughly. These cytoplasmic chemoreceptors are the subject of this review. Our analysis determined that 14% of bacterial and 43% of archaeal chemoreceptors are cytoplasmic, based on currently sequenced genomes. Cytoplasmic chemoreceptors appear to share the same key structural features as integral membrane chemoreceptors, including the formations of homodimers, trimers of dimers, and 12-nm hexagonal arrays within the cell. Cytoplasmic chemoreceptors exhibit varied subcellular locations, with some localizing to the poles and others appearing both cytoplasmic and polar. Some cytoplasmic chemoreceptors adopt more exotic locations, including the formations of exclusively internal clusters or moving dynamic clusters that coalesce at points of contact with other cells. Cytoplasmic chemoreceptors presumably sense signals within the cytoplasm and bear diverse signal input domains that are mostly N terminal to the domain that defines chemoreceptors, the so-called MA domain. Similar to the case for transmembrane receptors, our analysis suggests that the most common signal input domain is the PAS (Per-Arnt-Sim) domain, but a variety of other N-terminal domains exist. It is also common, however, for cytoplasmic chemoreceptors to have C-terminal domains that may function for signal input. The most common of these is the recently identified chemoreceptor zinc binding (CZB) domain, found in 8% of all cytoplasmic chemoreceptors. The widespread nature and diverse signal input domains suggest that these chemoreceptors can monitor a variety of cytoplasmically based signals, most of which remain to be determined.

Indexed as

ChemotaxisSignal TransductionArchaeaArchaeal ProteinsBacteriaBacterial ProteinsCytoplasmMembrane ProteinsModels, MolecularArchaeal ProteinsBacterial ProteinsMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25428939
PMCPMC4248653
OpenAlexW2088762030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.