Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25428895›Full record

ArticleDNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes2015

LTR retrotransposon dynamics in the evolution of the olive (Olea europaea) genome.

Elena Barghini, Lucia Natali, Tommaso Giordani, Rosa Maria Cossu, Simone Scalabrin, Federica Cattonaro, Hana Šimková, Jan Vrána, Jaroslav Doležel, Michele Morgante and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Chitinase genes in olive tree (Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Singular Evolution ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genome-wide analysis ofPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Elena BarghiniDepartment of Agricultural, Food, and Environmental Sciences, University of Pisa, Pisa I-56124, Italy.
Lucia NataliDepartment of Agricultural, Food, and Environmental Sciences, University of Pisa, Pisa I-56124, Italy.
Tommaso GiordaniDepartment of Agricultural, Food, and Environmental Sciences, University of Pisa, Pisa I-56124, Italy.
Rosa Maria CossuDepartment of Agricultural, Food, and Environmental Sciences, University of Pisa, Pisa I-56124, Italy Institute of Life Sciences, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Simone ScalabrinIGA Technology Service, Udine, Italy.
Federica CattonaroIGA Technology Service, Udine, Italy.
Hana ŠimkováInstitute of Experimental Botany, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Jan VránaInstitute of Experimental Botany, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Jaroslav DoleželInstitute of Experimental Botany, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Michele MorganteDepartment of Crop and Environmental Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy Institute of Applied Genomics, Udine, Italy.
Andrea CavalliniDepartment of Agricultural, Food, and Environmental Sciences, University of Pisa, Pisa I-56124, Italy andrea.cavallini@unipi.it.
University of Pisa · ITCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Botany · CZIstituto di Genomica Applicata · ITScuola Superiore Sant'Anna · ITUniversity of Udine · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improved knowledge of genome composition, especially of its repetitive component, generates important information for both theoretical and applied research. The olive repetitive component is made up of two main classes of sequences: tandem repeats and retrotransposons (REs). In this study, we provide characterization of a sample of 254 unique full-length long terminal repeat (LTR) REs. In the sample, Ty1-Copia elements were more numerous than Ty3-Gypsy elements. Mapping a large set of Illumina whole-genome shotgun reads onto the identified retroelement set revealed that Gypsy elements are more redundant than Copia elements. The insertion time of intact retroelements was estimated based on sister LTR's divergence. Although some elements inserted relatively recently, the mean insertion age of the isolated retroelements is around 18 million yrs. Gypsy and Copia retroelements showed different waves of transposition, with Gypsy elements especially active between 10 and 25 million yrs ago and nearly inactive in the last 7 million yrs. The occurrence of numerous solo-LTRs related to isolated full-length retroelements was ascertained for two Gypsy elements and one Copia element. Overall, the results reported in this study show that RE activity (both retrotransposition and DNA loss) has impacted the olive genome structure in more ancient times than in other angiosperms.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenome-Wide Association StudyRetroelementsTerminal Repeat SequencesOleaRetroelementsBAC sequencinginsertion ageLTR retrotransposonsnext-generation sequencingolive

Identifiers

PMID25428895
PMCPMC4379980
OpenAlexW2146769174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.