ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2015
Desire for Information in the Elderly: Interactions with Patients, Family, and Physicians.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Comparative Study of the Perspectives of Long-Stay Immigrants, Nurses and Cultural Mediators on Intercultural Communication: A Secondary Qualitative Analysis.Nursing open · 2024Article
- The Impact of Dementia on Cancer Treatment Decision-Making, Cancer Treatment, and Mortality: A Mixed Studies Review.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2021Review
- Sex Differences in Characteristics and Outcomes in Elderly Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction: AFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
- Dermatologic events from EGFR inhibitors: the issue of the missing patient voice.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer chemotherapy decisions in patients≥70 years old are complex. To assess the modes of communication with older lung cancer patients, we prospectively collected data. We assessed patients' level of knowledge about diagnosis and prognosis. Eighty-three patients diagnosed with lung cancer from January 2006 to February 2008 were recruited from a single center. Logistic regression and multiple imputation methods were used to assess associations between patient information and independent variables. Families received the diagnosis of lung cancer (92.8%). Family was more protective when the patients were elderly (p 0.036), depressed (p 0.054), had dementia (p 0.03), had poor performance status (p 0.03), or complied with frailty criteria (p 0.014). Physicians who gave cancer diagnoses were not oncologists and they usually gave cancer diagnosis preferably to family members. Only 27.7% of patients were informed that they had tumors. A 73.5% of patients actively solicited information; however, elderly and frail patients tended to do so less. A large proportion of elderly lung cancer patients do not receive adequate information about their disease prior to contact with oncologists. However, they do actively ask for information and speak about cancer with oncologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.