Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25428757›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2015

Gemcitabine plus capecitabine (Gem-Cape) biweekly in chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

P Jiménez-Fonseca, M P Solis, M Garrido, L Faez, D Rodriguez, A L Ruiz, M L Sanchez Lorenzo, E Uriol, M D Menendez, J M Viéitez

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Beyond second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

P Jiménez-FonsecaMedical Oncology Department, Asturias Central University Hospital, Carretera de Rubín s/n Finca "La Cadellada", 33011, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain, palucaji@hotmail.com.
M P Solis
M Garrido
L Faez
D Rodriguez
A L Ruiz
M L Sanchez Lorenzo
E Uriol
M D Menendez
J M Viéitez
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias · ESPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA proportion of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are still able to continue with active therapy after their progression to fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan regimens. Studies suggest that gemcitabine and fluoropyrimidines are synergic antimetabolites. The purpose was to evaluate gemcitabine-capecitabine (Gem-Cape) in heavily pretreated mCRC and to thus assess possible predictive factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND

methodsThis analysis was performed on 119 evaluable patients pretreated with fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and biological agents between June 2001 and July 2011. Patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) day 1 and capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) bid for 7 days every 2 weeks.

resultsThe general characteristics were ECOG 0-1, 89 %; male, 68 %, and median age 63 years. In total, 61 % had received two chemotherapy lines, while 39 % had received three or more. Objective response rates and stable disease rates at 3 months were 6.72 and 37.81 %, equalling a clinical benefit of 44.53 %. The median PFS and OS were 2.87 months [95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.53-3.17 months] and 6.53 months (95 % CI 5.33-8.77), respectively. The most frequent toxicities were grades 1-2, anemia (22 %), thrombocytopenia (10 %), and hand-foot syndrome (9 %); grade ≥3, diarrhea (2 %), with no treatment-related discontinuations. No treatment-related deaths were reported. Statistical significance was obtained by subgroups, assessing clinical benefits and objective responses for PFS and OS. Moreover, patients under 65 tended to have a better PFS.

conclusionThese data suggest that Gem-Cape is a tolerable and feasible regimen, associated with clinical benefit in non-selected, heavily pretreated, mCRC patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBone NeoplasmsCapecitabineColonic NeoplasmsDeoxycytidineDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGemcitabineHumansLiver NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedCapecitabineDeoxycytidineGemcitabine

Identifiers

PMID25428757
PMCPMC4544491
OpenAlexW1968476757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.