Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25428444›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2015

Out-of-range INR values and outcomes among new warfarin patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Winnie W Nelson, Li Wang, Onur Baser, Chandrasekharrao V Damaraju, Jeffrey R Schein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Maxillofacial haemorrhagic symptoms in emergency department patients: impact of antithrombotics.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Feasibility and safety of percutaneous epicardial access for mapping and ablation for ventricular arrhythmias in patients on oral anticoagulants.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. A Review of the Relationship of Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome.Current emergency and hospital medicine reports · 2016
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Winnie W NelsonHealth Economics & Outcomes Research (HECOR), Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 1000 US Highway 202 South, Room 3264, Raritan, NJ, 08869, USA, wnelson@its.jnj.com.
Li Wang
Onur Baser
Chandrasekharrao V Damaraju
Jeffrey R Schein

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough efficacious in stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, many warfarin patients are sub-optimally managed.

objectiveTo evaluate the association of international normalized ratio control and clinical outcomes among new warfarin patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

settingAdult non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients (≥18 years) initiating warfarin treatment were selected from the US Veterans Health Administration dataset between 10/2007 and 9/2012.

methodValid international normalized ratio values were examined from the warfarin initiation date through the earlier of the first clinical outcome, end of warfarin exposure or death. Each patient contributed multiple in-range and out-of-range time periods.

main outcome measureThe relative risk ratios of clinical outcomes associated with international normalized ratio control were estimated.

results34,346 patients were included for analysis. During the warfarin exposure period, the incidence of events per 100 person-years was highest when patients had international normalized ratio <2:13.66 for acute coronary syndrome; 10.30 for ischemic stroke; 2.93 for transient ischemic attack; 1.81 for systemic embolism; and 4.55 for major bleeding. Poisson regression confirmed that during periods with international normalized ratio <2, patients were at increased risk of developing acute coronary syndrome (relative risk ratio: 7.9; 95 % confidence interval 6.9-9.1), ischemic stroke (relative risk ratio: 7.6; 95 % confidence interval 6.5-8.9), transient ischemic attack (relative risk ratio: 8.2; 95 % confidence interval 6.1-11.2), systemic embolism (relative risk ratio: 6.3; 95 % confidence interval 4.4-8.9) and major bleeding (relative risk ratio: 2.6; 95 % confidence interval 2.2-3.0). During time periods with international normalized ratio >3, patients had significantly increased risk of major bleeding (relative risk ratio: 1.5; 95 % confidence interval 1.2-2.0).

conclusionIn a Veterans Health Administration non-valvular atrial fibrillation population, exposure to out-of-range international normalized ratio values was associated with significantly increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

United States Department of Veterans AffairsAdolescentAdultAgedAnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationFemaleHumansInternational Normalized RatioMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesWarfarinYoung AdultAnticoagulantsWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID25428444
PMCPMC4312387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.