ArticleNucleic acids research2015
Expanded microbial genome coverage and improved protein family annotation in the COG database.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 900 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
900 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic characterization ofVirulence · 2026Article
- Comparative genomic analysis of Agrobacterium salinitolerans provides insights into genetic diversity and pathogenic potential.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- Genome replication and cell division control by the methylation-sensitive GcrA regulator in Agrobacterium tumefaciens.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Article
- Hydrothermal regimes regulate microbiome patterns across vertical profile and their responses to alpine permafrost degradation.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
- Keystone taxa of phyllosphere microbiome confer resistance to citrus bacterial canker in pomelo via multiple mechanisms.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Article
- Isolation and characterization of two novel species Neorhizobium fuzhouense sp. nov. and Neotabrizicola paludis sp. nov.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2026Review
- Screening and characterization of Limosilactobacillus reuteri L16 and its probiotic properties in Hy-Line Brown chicks.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Multi-omics and cultivation reveal laminarin-degrading PVC bacteria in the deep sea.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Pangenomic and genomic plasticity analyses of the genus Rickettsia.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026Article
- Isolation and genomic analysis of otomycosis pathogens, and genomics-informed antimicrobial peptide design with potential therapeutic applications.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Leucobacter faecis sp. nov., a Novel Actinomycete Isolated from Bat Feces of Rousettus and Hipposideros spp.Current microbiology · 2026Article
- Phylogenetically diverse MucoralesMicrobial genomics · 2026Article
- Neobacillus camarae sp. nov. a new bacterium isolated from the breast milk of a Senegalese mother breast-feeding a healthy child and genomic description of Neobacillus dielmonensis DSM 27844 FF4Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2026Article
- "Let's Dry up and Survive Together": Is Anhydrobiosis in TwoInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Whole-genome sequence of Rahnella aceris HPDA25 isolated from mycorrhizosphere of Gastrodia elata.BMC genomic data · 2026Article
- Pan-genome insights into genetic diversity, evolutionary dynamics, and pathogenic traits of Staphylococcus agnetis.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Genomic Basis of Lifestyle Divergence in Rice-AssociatedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Guided Synthetic Microbial Communities Enable Functional and Sustainable Degradation of Persistent Environmental Pollutants.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
840 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microbial genome sequencing projects produce numerous sequences of deduced proteins, only a small fraction of which have been or will ever be studied experimentally. This leaves sequence analysis as the only feasible way to annotate these proteins and assign to them tentative functions. The Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins (COGs) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG/), first created in 1997, has been a popular tool for functional annotation. Its success was largely based on (i) its reliance on complete microbial genomes, which allowed reliable assignment of orthologs and paralogs for most genes; (ii) orthology-based approach, which used the function(s) of the characterized member(s) of the protein family (COG) to assign function(s) to the entire set of carefully identified orthologs and describe the range of potential functions when there were more than one; and (iii) careful manual curation of the annotation of the COGs, aimed at detailed prediction of the biological function(s) for each COG while avoiding annotation errors and overprediction. Here we present an update of the COGs, the first since 2003, and a comprehensive revision of the COG annotations and expansion of the genome coverage to include representative complete genomes from all bacterial and archaeal lineages down to the genus level. This re-analysis of the COGs shows that the original COG assignments had an error rate below 0.5% and allows an assessment of the progress in functional genomics in the past 12 years. During this time, functions of many previously uncharacterized COGs have been elucidated and tentative functional assignments of many COGs have been validated, either by targeted experiments or through the use of high-throughput methods. A particularly important development is the assignment of functions to several widespread, conserved proteins many of which turned out to participate in translation, in particular rRNA maturation and tRNA modification. The new version of the COGs is expected to become an important tool for microbial genomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.