Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25428346›Full record

Trial reportObesity facts2014

A web-based weight loss programme including breakfast cereals results in greater loss of body mass than a standardised web-based programme in a randomised controlled trial.

Margaret Ashwell, Elaine Howarth, David Chesters, Peter Allan, Alexa Hoyland, Jenny Walton

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Obesity facts, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Margaret Ashwell
Elaine Howarth
David Chesters
Peter Allan
Alexa Hoyland
Jenny Walton

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo test the hypothesis that promoting breakfast cereal consumption, as part of a web-based programme, results in loss of body mass.

methodsSingle centre, single blind, randomised parallel study. Test group followed a fully interactive website (B) with 'prescribed' breakfast cereals. Control group followed website (A) giving standard advice on weight loss.Study site visits at 0, 4, 12 and 24 weeks for measurements of height, weight, skinfolds, body fat, waist and hip circumference. 180 subjects were randomly allocated to two equal groups.Subjects were in good health and aged 19–50 years, with a BMI ranging from 25–40 kg/m 2 .At baseline there was no difference in mean age or BMI between the two groups.

resultsThe percentage change in body mass loss was greater when following website B than website A (n = 90; ITT repeated measures p = 0.013). For completers (website A: n = 62, website B: n= 64), the percentage change in body mass loss was also greater for website B than website A (repeated measures p = 0.023).

conclusionThe advice and motivation offered by an interactive website, including provision and consumption of breakfast cereals, results in significantly greater loss of body mass compared to the use of a standard website. It is not possible to discern which of the three factors is responsible.

Indexed as

BreakfastEdible GrainInternetWeight LossAdipose TissueAdolescentAdultBody Mass IndexBody WeightFemaleHumansMiddle AgedObesityOverweightSingle-Blind MethodWeight Reduction Programs

Identifiers

PMID25428346
PMCPMC5644801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.