Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25427970›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2014

Does pulse pressure variation predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xiaobo Yang, Bin Du

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 111 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02692222 completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Measurement of Pulse Pressure Variation (PPV) and Cardiac Output (CO) by a New Application for Android™ (Captesia™) : Comparison With PPV and CO Obtained by a Method of Transpulmonary Thermodilution.

TypeobservationalSponsorErasme University HospitalRan2016 to 2016Enrolled57ConditionsCoronary BypassArmsCalculation of PPV and CO with two methods
NCT06776666 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Pulse Pressure Variation and Central Venous Pressure for Fluid Management Guidance in Intracranial Tumor Surgery

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorPamukkale UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled42ConditionsBrain Tumor Adult, Pulse Pressure Variation, Central Venous Pressure, Fluid Management
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Observational
  19. Fluid management methods for severely burned patients: a narrative review.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026
    Review
  20. Article

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaobo YangMedical ICU, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, 1 Shuai Fu Yuan, Beijing, 100730, PR China. want.tofly@aliyun.com.
Bin DuMedical ICU, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, 1 Shuai Fu Yuan, Beijing, 100730, PR China. dubin98@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFluid resuscitation is crucial in managing hemodynamically unstable patients. The last decade witnessed the use of pulse pressure variation (PPV) to predict fluid responsiveness. However, as far as we know, no systematic review and meta-analysis has been carried out to evaluate the value of PPV in predicting fluid responsiveness specifically upon patients admitted into intensive care units.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE and EMBASE and included clinical trials that evaluated the association between PPV and fluid responsiveness after fluid challenge in mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units. Data were synthesized using an exact binomial rendition of the bivariate mixed-effects regression model modified for synthesis of diagnostic test data.

resultTwenty-two studies with 807 mechanically ventilated patients with tidal volume more than 8 ml/kg and without spontaneous breathing and cardiac arrhythmia were included, and 465 were responders (58%). The pooled sensitivity was 0.88 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81 to 0.92) and pooled specificity was 0.89 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.92). A summary receiver operating characteristic curve yielded an area under the curve of 0.94 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.95). A significant threshold effect was identified.

conclusionsPPV predicts fluid responsiveness accurately in mechanically ventilated patients with relative large tidal volume and without spontaneous breathing and cardiac arrhythmia.

Indexed as

Blood PressureClinical Trials as TopicCritical IllnessFluid TherapyHemodynamicsHumansIntensive Care UnitsTidal Volume

Identifiers

PMID25427970
PMCPMC4258282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.