ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2015
Automatic segmentation of subcutaneous mouse tumors by multiparametric MR analysis based on endogenous contrast.
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 3D whole body preclinical micro-CT database of subcutaneous tumors in mice with annotations from 3 annotators.Scientific data · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectContrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging is usually included in MRI procedures for automatic tumor segmentation. Use of an MR contrast agent may not be appropriate for some applications, however. We assessed the feasability of automatic tumor segmentation by multiparametric cluster analysis that uses intrinsic MRI contrast only. MATERIALS AND
methodsMultiparametric MRI consisting of quantitative T1, T2, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping was performed in mice bearing subcutaneous tumors (n = 21). k-means and fuzzy c-means clustering with all possible combinations of MRI parameters, i.e. feature vectors, and 2-7 clusters were performed on the multiparametric data. Clusters associated with tumor tissue were selected on the basis of the relative signal intensity of tumor tissue in T2-weighted images. The optimum segmentation method was determined by quantitative comparison of automatic segmentation with manual segmentation performed by three observers. In addition, the automatically segmented tumor volumes from seven separate tumor data sets were quantitatively compared with histology-derived tumor volumes.
resultsThe highest similarity index between manual and automatic segmentation (SI manual,automatic = 0.82 ± 0.06) was observed for k-means clustering with feature vector {T2, ADC} and four clusters. A strong linear correlation between automatically and manually segmented tumor volumes (R (2) = 0.99) was observed for this segmentation method. Automatically segmented tumor volumes also correlated strongly with histology-derived tumor volumes (R (2) = 0.96).
conclusionAutomatic segmentation of mouse subcutaneous tumors can be achieved on the basis of endogenous MR contrast only.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25427885What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.