Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25427885›Full record

ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2015

Automatic segmentation of subcutaneous mouse tumors by multiparametric MR analysis based on endogenous contrast.

Stefanie J C G Hectors, Igor Jacobs, Gustav J Strijkers, Klaas Nicolay

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stefanie J C G HectorsBiomedical NMR, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, s.j.c.g.hectors@tue.nl.
Igor Jacobs
Gustav J Strijkers
Klaas Nicolay

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectContrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging is usually included in MRI procedures for automatic tumor segmentation. Use of an MR contrast agent may not be appropriate for some applications, however. We assessed the feasability of automatic tumor segmentation by multiparametric cluster analysis that uses intrinsic MRI contrast only. MATERIALS AND

methodsMultiparametric MRI consisting of quantitative T1, T2, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping was performed in mice bearing subcutaneous tumors (n = 21). k-means and fuzzy c-means clustering with all possible combinations of MRI parameters, i.e. feature vectors, and 2-7 clusters were performed on the multiparametric data. Clusters associated with tumor tissue were selected on the basis of the relative signal intensity of tumor tissue in T2-weighted images. The optimum segmentation method was determined by quantitative comparison of automatic segmentation with manual segmentation performed by three observers. In addition, the automatically segmented tumor volumes from seven separate tumor data sets were quantitatively compared with histology-derived tumor volumes.

resultsThe highest similarity index between manual and automatic segmentation (SI manual,automatic = 0.82 ± 0.06) was observed for k-means clustering with feature vector {T2, ADC} and four clusters. A strong linear correlation between automatically and manually segmented tumor volumes (R (2) = 0.99) was observed for this segmentation method. Automatically segmented tumor volumes also correlated strongly with histology-derived tumor volumes (R (2) = 0.96).

conclusionAutomatic segmentation of mouse subcutaneous tumors can be achieved on the basis of endogenous MR contrast only.

Indexed as

AnimalsFeasibility StudiesHindlimbImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiceMice, Inbred BALB CPattern Recognition, AutomatedSoft Tissue NeoplasmsTumor Cells, Cultured

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.