Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25427881›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2015

Test-retest reliability of the novel 5-HT1B receptor PET radioligand [11C]P943.

Aybala Saricicek, Jason Chen, Beata Planeta, Barbara Ruf, Kalyani Subramanyam, Kathleen Maloney, David Matuskey, David Labaree, Lorenz Deserno, Alexander Neumeister and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Integrating brainstem and cortical functional architectures.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Aybala SaricicekDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Jason Chen
Beata Planeta
Barbara Ruf
Kalyani Subramanyam
Kathleen Maloney
David Matuskey
David Labaree
Lorenz Deserno
Alexander Neumeister
John H Krystal
Jean-Dominique Gallezot
Yiyun Huang
Richard E Carson
Zubin Bhagwagar

Funding

YALE UNIVERSITY CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARD PROGRAMUL1RR024139 · NCRR · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHERWIN, ROBERT S · 2006 to 2011
$56.8M
A study of GABA and 5-HT interactions to test a molecular model of vulnerabilityK23MH077914 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BHAGWAGAR, ZUBIN · 2007 to 2009
$543k
NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR024139NIMH NIH HHS K23-MH077914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose[(11)C]P943 is a novel, highly selective 5-HT1B PET radioligand. The aim of this study was to determine the test-retest reliability of [(11)C]P943 using two different modeling methods and to perform a power analysis with each quantification technique.

methodsSeven healthy volunteers underwent two PET scans on the same day. Regions of interest (ROIs) were the amygdala, hippocampus, pallidum, putamen, insula, frontal, anterior cingulate, parietal, temporal and occipital cortices, and cerebellum. Two multilinear radioligand quantification techniques were used to estimate binding potential: MA1, using arterial input function data, and the second version of the multilinear reference tissue model analysis (MRTM2), using the cerebellum as the reference region. Between-scan percent variability and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to assess test-retest reliability. We also performed power analyses to determine the method that would allow the least number of subjects using within-subject or between-subject study designs. A voxel-wise ICC analysis for MRTM2 BPND was performed for the whole brain and all the ROIs studied.

resultsMean percent variability between two scans across regions ranged between 0.4 % and 12.4 % for MA1 BPND, 0.5 % and 11.5 % for MA1 BPP, 16.7 % and 28.3 % for MA1 BPF, and between 0.2 % and 5.4 % for MRTM2 BPND. The power analyses showed a greater number of subjects were required using MA1 BPF compared with other outcome measures for both within-subject and between-subject study designs. ICC values were the highest using MRTM2 BPND and the lowest with MA1 BPF in ten ROIs. Small regions and regions with low binding had lower ICC values than large regions and regions with high binding.

conclusionReliable measures of 5-HT1B receptor binding can be obtained using the novel PET radioligand [(11)C]P943. Quantification of 5-HT1B receptor binding with MRTM2 BPND and with MA1 BPP provided the least variability and optimal power for within-subject and between-subject designs.

Indexed as

Positron-Emission TomographyBrainCarbon RadioisotopesFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMalePiperazinesProtein BindingPyrrolidinonesRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1BReproducibility of ResultsTissue DistributionYoung Adult1-(4-(2-methoxyisopropyl)phenyl)-3-(2-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)benzyl)pyrrolidin-2-oneCarbon RadioisotopesPiperazinesPyrrolidinonesRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1B

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.