Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25427629›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2015

Ambulatory haemorrhoidal surgery: systematic literature review and qualitative analysis.

B Vinson-Bonnet, T Higuero, J L Faucheron, A Senejoux, F Pigot, L Siproudhis

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05177016 (Evaluation of Outpatient Hemorrhoidectomies at the Paris Saint Joseph Hospital Group), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05177016 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Outpatient Hemorrhoidectomies at the Paris Saint Joseph Hospital Group

TypeobservationalSponsorFondation Hôpital Saint-JosephRan2021 to 2022Enrolled397ConditionsTripedicular Hemorrhoidectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

B Vinson-BonnetDepartment of Visceral and Ambulatory Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy Saint Germain en Laye, 10 rue du champ Gaillard, BP 73082, 78303, Poissy cedex, France, bvinsonbonnet@gmail.com.
T Higuero
J L Faucheron
A Senejoux
F Pigot
L Siproudhis
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy · FRCentre Hospitalier privé Saint Grégoire · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRGénérale-Beaulieu Clinic · CHHôpital Pontchaillou · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aims of this study are to review the advantages and drawbacks of the ambulatory management of patients scheduled for haemorrhoidal surgery and to highlight the reasons for unplanned hospital admission and suggest preventive strategies.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of the literature from January 1999 to January 2013 using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Manuscripts were specifically analysed for failure and side effects of haemorrhoidal surgery in ambulatory settings.

resultsFifty relevant studies (6082 patients) were retrieved from the literature review. The rate of ambulatory management failure ranged between 0 and 61%. The main reasons for failure were urinary retention, postoperative haemorrhage and unsatisfactory pain control. Spinal anaesthesia was associated with the highest rates of urinary retention. Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation has less frequent side effects susceptible to impair ambulatory management than haemorrhoidectomy and stapled haemorrhoidopexy. However, the fact that haemorrhoidopexy is less painful than haemorrhoidectomy may allow ambulatory management.

conclusionDay-case haemorrhoidal surgery can be performed whatever the surgical procedure. Postoperative pain deserves special prevention measures after haemorrhoidectomy, especially by using perineal block or infiltrations. Urinary retention is a common issue that can be responsible for failure; it requires a preventive strategy including short duration spinal anaesthesia. Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation is easy to perform in outpatients but deserves more complete evaluation in this setting.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Surgical ProceduresHemorrhoidectomyHemorrhoidsHumansLigationPostoperative HemorrhagePostoperative PainSurgical StaplingUrinary Retention

Identifiers

PMID25427629
OpenAlexW1969452953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.